With origins dating back to ancient Greece, democracy is considered one of the fundamental and fundamental characteristics of the United States. It is a political system and a means for the citizens of a nation to choose their leaders and hold them accountable for their actions and policies. This can only be accomplished through the upholding and preservation of four fundamental pillars: protection of the human rights of the people, due process of law, active political participation of the people, and fair and free elections. This highlights the importance of having a strong and stable central government that prevents the emergence of a monarchy. For this reason, I argue that the system of checks and balances is the most essential factor in promoting American democracy. While echoing the voices and intentions of the framers of the Constitution, the system of checks and balances unifies the country's citizens, regardless of ethnicity, background, socio-economic status, gender and political party, under a systemic idea for which the growth of democracy could be viable. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Before the creation and development of the United States, the original 13 colonies fought for the possibility of everything we have today. However, the real driving force and main instigator was the tyranny of the British throne. The monarchy returning to the mother country (Britain) provided the colonists with the right fuel for revolution, such as: the Stamp Act, the establishment of tyrannical authority in place of representative government, the rejection of the legislation proposed by the colonies, the replacement of colonial governments by its own governments. personal ministers, etc. (Kennel et al. 2016). Not only did this pave the way for a revolution, but it also created the fundamental need for a representative democracy rather than another tyrannical monarchy. Fearing another case from King George III, the Fathers established a system of checks and balances based largely on the French system. the philosopher Charles, Baron de Montesquieu, who argued that "the concentration of governmental power could be effectively limited by placing the various functions of government – ​​legislative, executive and judicial – in separate and independent institutions." Simply put, the system would allow each of the three branches of government to limit or control the authority of the other two (Kennel et al. 2016, 59). This implementation was certainly a direct consequence of the perceived horrors of monarchical rule. Fortunately for us, this gave rise to a new form of government in America: democracy. Removing the possibility of tyranny is fundamental to American democracy to the extent that it allows it (American democracy) to exist. Without ways to protect our government from a possible takeover by a higher branch or sector with too much power, democracy would be eradicated and the people would have to answer to a dominant power (the monarchy). Our country's founders recognized this potential problem and implemented two systems: the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances. The latter phenomenon can be observed throughout history and even in modern times, when the executive branch vetoes legislative bills while the judiciary can declare executive acts unconstitutional, etc...