blog




  • Essay / Mary Wollstonecraft and Malala Yousafzai: The time has come for gender injustice

    Born to wash clothes, take care of children, make sure there is food on the table for the family and to please their husbands, these were the expectations of women. Women were trained by society to serve their husbands and families. Mary Wollstonecraft, in her work “On the Pernicious Effects of Unnatural Distinctions in Society,” argues that women are capable of much more than housework. She believes that women are not inferior to men; women can be just as intellectual as them. Wollstonecraft was an 18th-century writer who fought for women's rights; Even today, women around the world are fighting to achieve the same respect as men. Malala Yousafzai, in her book I Am Malala, is an example of Pakistani women being deprived of their education, deprived of their freedom of expression and forced to depend on men. Malala and Wollstonecraft are very similar women, in which they both come from difficult environments where women are looked down upon. Malala builds on Wollstonecraft's ideas by highlighting the reality that women are still considered inferior to men today. Malala is the most effective writer because she uses logos, ethos, and pathos to draw the world's attention to the fact that women live in slavery. While Wollstonecraft uses more of a symbolic and metaphorical style to tell readers how unfair women are. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayMary Wollstonecraft, the author of the essay “Pernicious Effects that Result from Unnatural Distinctions Made in Society,” Discusses many different issues with the 18th century. Wollstonecraft notes that wealth ruins women's moral excellence because they become ornaments on a Christmas tree. They do not need to cook, clean the house or take care of children because they can afford to hire servants to do their household chores. Wollstonecraft believed that women should be able to fight for themselves and be independent, but because women are only seen as having the role of pleasing and nurturing, it is almost impossible for women to break away from the chains of society that hold them together. Wollstonecraft uses strong visual examples and symbolic language to effectively convince an audience who is critical of women. She draws attention to the British Empire, “the slavery which chains the very soul of woman, keeping her forever in bondage to ignorance.” Wollstonecraft defines how women are in a mental state of slavery; they were born into a society that imposes limits on women. For example, women cannot qualify to work in certain professional fields, such as medicine or politics, due to lack of education. This makes it difficult for women to be independent from men, as it would be a daunting task for women to find a job that would allow them to support themselves with a simple cost of living by giving themselves a roof over their heads and daily bread . We can see how the chains symbolize the limitations that prevent women from exercising vigorously. This highlights that women should not be deprived of their natural rights but should have the same opportunities as men, such as education. Wollstonecraft also uses metaphorical language when illustrating how African Americans were used to pleasewhite men and how women are also used to please men; “Must half of the human species, like the poor African slaves, be subjected to prejudices which stupefy them, when principles would be a surer guard, only to sweeten the cup of man? Wollstonecraft metaphorically said that the women of her time are similar to African-American women, whose only role in life was to obey and follow the way society represents them, to live. This is notable because slaves were considered property and not people; they were also very despised and poorly treated. This comparison that Wollstonecraft uses about slaves and women causes the reader to reconsider how their wives and mothers are viewed in society. Wollstonecraft was very bold in speaking out against the mistreatment of women, as many criticized the way she viewed the role of women in society. We can compare Malala Yousafzai to Wollstonecraft since they are women who defend the natural rights enjoyed by women. Malala Yousafzai, the young girl who spoke out against the brutality happening in Pakistan, grabbed the attention of nations through the media by highlighting the injustice happening to women. Yousafzai was born in Pakistan and not only witnessed the hostile environment women lived in, but also experienced the discrimination they faced. This builds credibility by showing the reader how Yousafzai is not researching the injustice of women in Pakistan but has lived among the women who have been discriminated against. This is important because the reader gets a first-person view of what Yousafzai saw, felt, and thought about the injustices faced by women. In her book “I Am Malala,” Yousafzai wastes no time in telling the reader how from birth, girls are adulterated in Pakistani society, but when boys are born, “guns are fired to celebrate a son, while the girls are hidden behind a curtain. ". Yousafzai uses pathos in these quotes by making the reader feel empathy because a girl child is not welcome in Pakistani culture, rather she is hidden away as if parents are ashamed of having a daughter. This shows how women are looked down upon because of the role they have to take on in Pakistan, namely rearing and feeding. This reminds the reader that inequality for women still exists in Pakistan today. Women are very limited in what profession they can choose; they can't even walk the streets alone. In addition to this, they must wear shalwar kameez and be covered from head to toe every day. This highlights how difficult it is for a woman to be independent from men because she does not have the same opportunities and freedoms as men. Yousafzai explains how a group of five religious parties named Muttahida Majlis e-Amal wanted to abolish the face of women from society. Yousafzai points out: “MMA activists launched attacks on cinemas and tore down billboards with photos of women or blackened them with paint. They even snatched female mannequins from clothing stores.” This shows that women in Pakistan are not considered as human beings but rather as an object or property. This is important because women are no better than a stray dog ​​on the street that can easily be picked up and taken away. Not only are women seen as objects, but they are also held responsible for the disasters that occur in Pakistan. Yousafzai says: “,.