When we think of another person committing suicide, multiple reactions are created in that individual. Some may pity the deceased, others may blame themselves, and still others may view the act so poorly that they choose to forget the person entirely. Yet for some reason, when we think of a suicide bomber rather than someone who committed suicide, that feeling changes. At this point, the suicide bomber not only kills himself, but also other innocent people, which some might call murder. We therefore consider the suicide bomber as a murderer and not just as someone who committed suicide. Say no. to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay This separation between killing oneself only and killing others is what most find so disturbing and frightening about suicide bombers, but it is important to focus on the individual in order to determine the purpose of that particular bodily rhetorical style. In the West, our exposure to suicide attacks is fortunately and unfortunately fueled by the mainstream media. When we see images or hear a story of a suicide bomber killing innocent people in a small cafe, we first feel anger at the idea of ​​someone doing such a thing and often wrongly associate the act with religious extremism. We rarely view suicide bombings as an active form of protest aimed at drawing attention to a particular neglected issue. As Kevin DeLuca mentions in his article "Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of Earth First!, Act Up and Queer Nation", the body is actually a medium through which messages can be sent and new, unconventional ideas can be presented . The body can therefore be considered as the platform for an argumentative strategy. In this case, the argumentative strategy would be suicide bombing and the body would be the platform through which to use this strategy. According to DeLuca, new social movements stand out for three main reasons: They reject traditional organizational structures while forming radically democratic disorganizations. of public argumentation while applying unorthodox political tactics that highlight bodies as resources for argumentation and advocacy” (De Luca 9). When analyzing suicide bombings, it can be said that the act follows the above three precepts and therefore can be seen as a new social movement created to fundamentally change the way of thinking of traditional society. Unlike the social movements that society is traditionally accustomed to, suicide attacks take the known vulnerability of the human body and push it to the extreme extreme; death. Other social movements like those of Earth First and Act Up of course put their representatives in danger during demonstrations, but certainly do not go as far as suicide attacks. As DeLuca mentions, the protester “adopts” the mindset of the idea they are representing and becomes one with the topic at hand. For example, the member of Earth First who decides to bury himself up to his neck in the forest path then adopts the worldview of the soil that he represents. Likewise, the individual who decides to live in a tree to protect it from felling adopts the perspective of this tree, becomes one with it and is therefore united with the object he aims to protect. Interestingly, what suicide bombers become one with is death, and rather than showing a clear stance of solidarity with an issue they care about, they remove themselves from the picture altogether. The human being does notdoes not translate his human body into an ecocentric body like the members of Earth First, nor into a homoerotic body like the members of Earth First. The members of Act Up, rather the suicide bomber, seem to remove their body from the argumentative process. While this may seem like a downfall of the suicide bombers' body rhetoric, it could actually be considered a very effective force. The fact that a person's life is so horrible that they decide to commit suicide publicly, in full view of everyone, shows that there is something about this area that needs to be addressed and can ultimately be considered a cry for help. Their own lives are an effective rhetorical tactic of the suicide bombers, but their act of taking the lives of others is the missing link that must be addressed. Although taking another life is not something that should ever be underestimated or supported, it is in fact another effective strategy of suicide bombers. As mentioned above, when one person commits suicide, it is a sad ordeal, but when multiple lives are lost due to the actions of one person, it is definitely considered a tragedy. The concept of location (and therefore the number of people involved) is essential when it comes to creating an effective suicide attack, as it is directly linked to the attention the suicide bomber will attract to his actions. For example, if a suicide bomber decides to achieve his objective in the middle of the desert or on an island without people, this will be considered a regular suicide and there will be no media coverage of the event and therefore of the objective. to bring attention to the region would not be brought. One reason suicide bombers choose densely populated centers is that killing several people will always attract more attention than killing just one. Furthermore, the death of innocent people will certainly attract even more attention and therefore there will be a greater probability that someone will be affected by the bombing and therefore requires some action to resolve the problems that arise in the region. Another aspect of suicide bombing that is directly related to its effectiveness is the idea of ​​distraction. Any act of protest is a distraction from daily life, but when a body is used as a tool of protest, the greatest distraction is created. The body, and therefore each individual, is supposed to follow certain rules and live in a certain way in order to follow a path that has been created for it by society. We are supposed to wake up in the morning, eat, go to work/school, come home, eat and sleep. When there is any sort of disruption in this daily routine, not only is the individual participating in it thrown out of balance, but so is the entire social order. Suicide bombings are therefore one of those distractions, both literally and figuratively, from daily life that deserve special attention from members stuck in the daily cycle that society has deemed appropriate. The simple act of walking into a busy center and detonating a bomb is of course an obvious distraction from everyday life that makes the world first think, then react with horror to what has just happened. The figurative act of a suicide attack, even if it takes place in a remote part of the world, also provides an incentive to stop what you are doing and pay attention to the attack. In this sense, the suicide bombers have effectively drawn our attention and focused our attention on their part of the world. Although suicide bomber tactics can be considered effective in their execution, the overall effectiveness can be significantly distorted depending on the notion of external intervention. management. As DeLuca points out, media framing tells the viewer what they.