While the great physicist Albert Einstein and civil rights leader Mahatma Gandhi shared the hallmarks of a lifelong dedication to a plant-based diet, each of these characters has done so. for different reasons. Gandhi made his decision to be a vegetarian based on spiritual and philosophical principles, whereas Einstein simply viewed vegetarianism as a logical and informed choice. However, you don't have to be a great thinker or a great leader to save the world. All people can and should adopt a plant-based diet to ensure the health of people, the environment, and the resources that fuel the economy. A plant-based diet can have benefits that go beyond simply avoiding the unpleasant thought of how animals in modern society are raised and harvested for use as human food. By adopting a plant-based diet, it is possible to develop a positive impact on the environment, on personal health and on the economic productivity that determines quality of life. Although there are arguments against adopting a plant-based diet, these arguments require acceptance of unnecessary death and suffering within the population due to preventable disease and premature mortality, as well than environmental impacts that create poor conditions for sustainable use. As this article will show, the counterargument also advances flawed arguments that, when considered, increase the value of choosing a plant-based diet over a meat-based diet. All levels of evidence clearly indicate that adopting a plant-based diet is the best choice, with the fewest negative impacts and the most positive impacts on all stakeholders. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayEating meat has terrible impacts on the environment and creates short and long term problems. In order to raise the chickens, pigs, cattle, turkeys, and other domestic animals consumed by humans, inputs include enormous amounts of land, including land for the animals as well as their food sources; high energy consumption; and enormous quantities of water, including the production of immense quantities of potentially biohazardous wastewater. Environmental risks, including contamination of air, water and soil and capture of carbon from the atmosphere, are caused by modern practices in factories and animal farms. Meat production has a very negative impact on environmental health and contributes to climate change, but these important considerations are not often known to the general public. Furthermore, it is not always realized that the environmental burden, including land use and risks of environmental damage, is much less intense or harmful for plant-based agriculture than for raising animal products. The energy required as well as the gases released by animals in the form of flatulence are the cause of significant contamination of the atmosphere. Lack of awareness of important reasons to reduce meat consumption is not sustainable. Unfortunately, ignorance of the real impacts of meat production and consumption is reinforced by the high value that some cultures and groups place on meat consumption, and this challenge has been difficult to overcome. At the same time, pressuresGrowing populations increase the environmental pressure created by increased meat production to meet growing demand. The question of sustainability will soon become unavoidable, and difficult decisions about what society must give up to facilitate continued meat production could be an unfortunate consequence if things continue to evolve based on the status quo. Furthermore, it predicts even higher levels of illness and early death, as well as a worsening spiral of negative consequences as environmental health, personal health and the health of the economy come into crisis. , illness and allocation of resources to solve avoidable problems. Personal risks of not eating a plant-based diet include an increased risk of premature death from preventable disease. The many diseases that become riskier with increased meat consumption include diabetes, heart disease and failure, stroke and cancer. This includes the risks of developing these diseases, as well as the risks of disease management and their potential acute consequences. Besides the higher risks of chronic diseases, there are also higher risks of food poisoning, parasitic infection or simply rancid foods. There is truth to the claim that meat contains nutrients in the form of amino acids, calories, iron and vitamins such as B12 that cannot be produced by plants, but these are all available by eating plants. Additionally, wealthy societies unfortunately tend to eat far more meat than their individuals need to meet their nutritional needs, leading to high levels of obesity and poor health. A more disgusting aspect of meat is the presence of parasites and bacterial diseases. For example, pork may contain Trichinella. Deli meats and similar products processed into chicken, beef, pork, turkey and mixed products are at risk of being contaminated with Listeria. These personal risks, both from infectious diseases and preventable lifestyle illnesses, should be enough to prove that there are many downsides and disadvantages to meat consumption. On the other hand, a plant-based diet is associated with many personal benefits and benefits, such as a healthier weight. Avoiding disease, living longer and looking healthy are just some of the personal benefits of adopting a plant-based diet. One of the most important aspects of studying economics is resource allocation. Currently, a significant amount of land, antibiotics and other resources are required to produce food animals. If much or all of the world's population adopted a plant-based diet, then these resources could be allocated to more productive uses, including bioethanol and plant-based fuels, as well as other non-food productive uses. This is due to the need to use large areas of land to support meat farming, as the animals themselves need food. The resulting land use on a non-meat-eating planet would be very different, with significant land remaining after the necessary allocation for plant-based food production. This becomes even more important when considering the alternative, namely the increasing allocation of productive resources to meat production to meetto the needs of a growing global population with rising incomes. The plant-based diet would also drive another area of ​​resource allocation: health care. By reducing or preventing many chronic diseases through the adoption of a plant-based diet, health care resources would not be strained for the management of chronic diseases and acute events related to diseases caused by the lifestyle. Health systems could better focus on prevention and wellness, and patients would benefit from optimized health outcomes. Perhaps the money currently spent by individuals, governments and other actors would instead be directed to more productive uses that leverage innovation and economic growth. Many positive side effects are likely if people adopt a plant-based diet, as many negative consequences would end or be reduced, leaving resources free and providing greater value to society as a whole on many levels. Not everyone agrees that adopting a plant-based diet could create cumulative positive results. Although there is broad consensus that vegetables are good for you, there is no consensus on adopting a plant-based diet, and this concept attracts criticism. Naysayers and meat eaters who do not support adopting a plant-based diet point to the fact that meat contains nutrients humans need and that a vegetarian diet can still be unhealthy. For example, a vegetarian diet consisting only of meat-free but processed foods may contain too much salt, fat and sugar. There is also truth to the statement that poor food choices are still possible even if one does not eat meat. A plant-based diet has other important connotations, however. For example, many of the unhealthy aspects of non-meat choices involve foods containing salt, sugar, or high fat content. These are foods that move away from the concept of plant origin, which, while accepting some basic processing and processing of plants, does not at all provide for the addition of highly processed plant-based flavors . Additionally, the plant-based diet goes further than just being vegetarian or not eating meat, as such a plant-based diet excludes dairy, eggs, and whole-grain foods. similar animal foods that are acceptable in some vegetarian diets, but are not actually plant-based. The fact that meat has nutrients is also important. When it comes to protein, including iron and other needs, plants can provide everything needed except vitamin B12, which can be obtained from specially prepared herbal supplements , in combination with a healthy lifestyle including outdoor sun exposure. The unnecessary suffering of hundreds of millions of people can be avoided through this simple lifestyle change, but in doing so the average individual leading a modern Western lifestyle will find that it goes against many easy and affordable prices offered for food consumption. . This may change as more people adopt a plant-based diet, increasing demand for affordable, sustainably produced plant-based food products. Although those who hold the contrary position that meat is an important part,, 17(2), 61-66.