-
Essay / Researching the philosophy that was most meaningful to America in the 1960s
The civil rights movement began shortly after the end of World War II. Some will even say that it started before. The United States took its biggest turn on the civil road with the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education. This decision sparked a revolution that would change America forever. Once this movement started it didn't stop, there was no turning back and Martin Luther King Jr. realized this while Malcolm X did not. He preached change that African Americans would enforce, but only through nonviolence. Martin Luther King's philosophy made more sense to America in the 1960s because it moved America forward, it ended bloodshed through nonviolence and love, and it called for make everyone equal and united. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm , their philosophies were very different from each other (Document A). Malcolm X made it clear that he believed African Americans and whites should remain separate but considered equal to each other. He told the whites “to work together with us, each of us working among his own people” (Document C). Martin Luther King Jr., for his part, never stopped preaching equality and desegregation. He wanted whites and African Americans to work together. He said in his famous speech: "We will be able to work together, pray together, fight together, go to prison together, climb to freedom together, knowing that one day we will be free." (Document B). It is obvious that Malcolm X was only seeking to take America backwards. By the 1960s, blacks were already enrolled in white schools and he encouraged blacks to establish all black educational institutes and workshops (Document E). Martin Luther King's philosophy was perfect at the time because it pushed America toward desegregation. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had opposing views on how they wanted to fight the civil rights movement. King took the non-violent path while Malcolm X took the violent path. King believed that black people should not cooperate with evil and that protests and boycotts were their nonviolent arsenal (Document F). He believed that violence increased hatred and was a spiral that led nowhere and solved no problems (Document J). He even considered violence, but then said: “in the event of a violent revolution. We would be vastly outnumbered…Black Americans have no alternative to nonviolence.” (Document L). Martin Luther King Jr. strongly believed in the power of love over hate. He knew that black people could handle all the pain and suffering that white people inflicted on them and that white people would soon tire of their capacity to suffer. He believed they could appeal to the hearts of white people (Document H), which was exactly what was good for the nation at that time, peace. Malcolm X believed exactly the opposite of Martin Luther King Jr. He wanted black people to fight. back. He wanted white people to suffer like black people. He believed that white people had only one language, blood and brutality and that the only way to make them listen was to speak to them in their own language (Document I). Malcolm..