Did you know that the chances of the proteins needed to create a strand of DNA aligning naturally are only 1 every 4x10022 years (Werner 104)? This is highly improbable! Darwin did not expect that future discoveries would disprove the fundamental tenets of his theory of evolution. Modern science repeatedly discovers evidence suggesting that Darwinian evolution could not explain life on Earth. The theory of evolution, proposed by Darwin, has been increasingly refuted due to its reliance on an implausible claim of spontaneous generation, gaps in the fossil record for which evolution lacks explanations and scientific discoveries contradictory which upset the concepts on which evolutionists relied. refers to the theory that life evolved rapidly from nothing. Mounting evidence makes the argument for spontaneous generation untenable. No biological phylum (a level of classification of organisms) has yet been discovered to support Darwin's theory. What is even more reprehensible is that Darwin understood taxonomy (the classification of living organisms), but he refused to recognize or explain the shortcomings of his theory. For example, spontaneous generation, a necessary assumption in Darwin's theory, cannot explain how proteins form. Evolutionists suggest that proteins or DNA were involved in the first living organism. However, proteins cannot be formed naturally, yet they are necessary for the formation of DNA. This raises the “chicken and egg question”, which came first? Evolutionists cannot explain this, providing no rationale for how proteins and DNA could have been involved in spontaneous generation. Amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, should have formed naturally to allow paper to form. ......Christians Should Believe Wheaton: Crossway, 2010, 79-108.Jenkins, Kathleen E. “Genetics and Faith: Religious Enchantment through Creative Engagement with Molecular Biology” Academic Journal Opposing Viewpoints. Center for Research on Opposing Viewpoints. Internet. December 4, 2011. Wells, Jonathan. “Evolution by design succeeds where Darwinism fails” At issue: creationism versus evolution. Ed. Bruno J. Léone. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. December 5, 2011. Wells, Jonathan. Why Darwinism is Wrong Discovery Institute, May 18, 2009. Discovery Institute, Center for Science and Culture. December 5, 2011. Werner, Dr. Carl. Evolution: The Great Experiment Vol. 1. Green Forest: New Leaf Editions. PrintWilker, Benjamin D. “Creationism Explains Life on Earth.” » At issue: creationism versus evolution. Ed. Eric Braun. Greenhaven Press, 2005. Print.