Throughout this course we have so far discussed generically the different models of mediation (especially facilitative), the skills and tasks needed for a mediator to lead successful mediation. The facilitation approach we studied, via theory and classroom exercises, gave us excellent insight into mediation in a variety of domestic conflicts, ranging from family to business conflicts. However, there is a whole other subfield of mediation, which we have not yet studied. discussed and it is international mediation. International mediation also takes various forms. Mediation cases can range from a conflict between two states, to an ethnic conflict that has generated violence within a particular state, or perhaps a trade dispute between transnational corporations. The mediation process is difficult in itself, but one can imagine the serious complexities that can be encountered when attempting to mediate across ethnic, linguistic and cultural divides. As someone interested in international conflict resolution work, I think it is important to ask whether the same necessary roles and tasks will be the same, improved, or in some cases ineffective. The aim of this essay will be to explore this question by explaining international issues. mediation in relation to some of the themes and theories we discussed in class regarding the roles, tasks and abilities of mediators. Let us now briefly examine some of the motives behind international mediation. As an instrument of diplomacy and foreign policy Mediation has become almost as common as conflict itself. It is practiced daily by actors as disparate as individuals, government officials, private sector actors, private sector actors, private sector actors, private sector actors, private sector actors, and organizations of civil society. religious figures, regional, non-governmental and international organizations; ad hoc meetings, or...... in the middle of a document...... expressed interests may offer incentives or threaten sanctions, depending on the outcome of the mediation. The idea of ​​credibility is also very important. In the international context, the fact that a mediator is able to achieve a result that pleases those he represents will reward them. Comparing and contrasting, these two mediation processes were interesting. We can clearly see major similarities, as well as major differences. I find the context of international mediation quite interesting and fascinating; to be honest, more than national mediation. This is obviously partly due to my experience in international relations. It appears that mediation at the international level creates a context that helps create a balance of power that helps maintain peace and security, there to support humanity and a better future.