""America's Failing Experiment: How We, the People, Became the Problem and Unconditional Democratic Values Contribute to the Failure of Our System. In his book, he analyzes the collective mentality of what he considers like that of most of America and correlates it with how our behaviors, decision-making abilities, and participation in our government affect our society.Say No to Plagiarism Get a Custom Essay. on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay That being said, he ultimately points the finger at us, the citizens, for allowing this to continue- as well as our policymakers for making decisions based on the information they have and points out that most of the time the information they have is often incorrect, misinterpreted and/or misconstrued The argument(s) Goidel uses to defend his argument. The thesis is that he claims that too much democracy in America is what our government is lacking. First, recognize that America is also responsible for doing things this way and for conditioning its citizens to want and rely too much on democracy. Goidel writes, for example, that "despite [America's] advanced capitalist economic system, the United States has been more hostile to socialist political parties than other industrial democracies," thus strongly discouraging the practice and beliefs behind socialist politics. political ideology that is socialism and encouraging (mostly only) democracy and how good it is. Goidel continues his argument by blaming America, its strong assertion of democracy, its ideas and its values, for being the reason our political culture is the way it is. He says that "the deep context of American politics, discreet but strictly respected, has limited the scope of ideological debate to the narrow territorial boundaries of classical liberal political thought", which seems convincing to me in the sense that leads me to be agree with his opinion. The thesis that too much democracy ultimately kills our democracy. But I basically have to and agree with his thesis (even though I know I'm part of the problem he claims) because he recognizes the fact that America is also responsible for shaping us to think this way. way ; In a country that values democracy so much and imposes these types of characteristics and beliefs on its citizens. That being said, I must say that one of the weaknesses of his argument is to accuse us of wanting "too much democracy" when that is what we (American citizens) are taught from birth, not only verbally but also physically and mentally. I can see it through our government, the policies it makes, its process and its motivations. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Overall, after reading this book, I 'I say that Goidel contributed greatly to my understanding of American politics by taking me on a reading journey of simply looking at things in our government, our values and our problems from a different perspective. Although I still stand by the fact that we are taught that we, the American people "demos", have had power "kratos", since the day we entered this world and that we cannot be entirely blamed for it want or even “too much”. Goidel made me understand that our reality is that democracy is just a cycle in our government, it's just a chain reaction and every time it happens, every time.

Essay / ""America's Failing Experiment: How We, the People, Became the Problem and Unconditional Democratic Values Contribute to the Failure of Our System. In his book, he analyzes the collective mentality of what he considers like that of most of America and correlates it with how our behaviors, decision-making abilities, and participation in our government affect our society.Say No to Plagiarism Get a Custom Essay. on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay That being said, he ultimately points the finger at us, the citizens, for allowing this to continue- as well as our policymakers for making decisions based on the information they have and points out that most of the time the information they have is often incorrect, misinterpreted and/or misconstrued The argument(s) Goidel uses to defend his argument. The thesis is that he claims that too much democracy in America is what our government is lacking. First, recognize that America is also responsible for doing things this way and for conditioning its citizens to want and rely too much on democracy. Goidel writes, for example, that "despite [America's] advanced capitalist economic system, the United States has been more hostile to socialist political parties than other industrial democracies," thus strongly discouraging the practice and beliefs behind socialist politics. political ideology that is socialism and encouraging (mostly only) democracy and how good it is. Goidel continues his argument by blaming America, its strong assertion of democracy, its ideas and its values, for being the reason our political culture is the way it is. He says that "the deep context of American politics, discreet but strictly respected, has limited the scope of ideological debate to the narrow territorial boundaries of classical liberal political thought", which seems convincing to me in the sense that leads me to be agree with his opinion. The thesis that too much democracy ultimately kills our democracy. But I basically have to and agree with his thesis (even though I know I'm part of the problem he claims) because he recognizes the fact that America is also responsible for shaping us to think this way. way ; In a country that values democracy so much and imposes these types of characteristics and beliefs on its citizens. That being said, I must say that one of the weaknesses of his argument is to accuse us of wanting "too much democracy" when that is what we (American citizens) are taught from birth, not only verbally but also physically and mentally. I can see it through our government, the policies it makes, its process and its motivations. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Overall, after reading this book, I 'I say that Goidel contributed greatly to my understanding of American politics by taking me on a reading journey of simply looking at things in our government, our values and our problems from a different perspective. Although I still stand by the fact that we are taught that we, the American people "demos", have had power "kratos", since the day we entered this world and that we cannot be entirely blamed for it want or even “too much”. Goidel made me understand that our reality is that democracy is just a cycle in our government, it's just a chain reaction and every time it happens, every time.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch