Any new recruit within the company structure must understand what is expected of them. It allows the new employee to behave according to the merits found in the best interest of the organization, its partners, customers and shareholders. This alignment can be achieved in several ways. This includes a published code of ethics, mission statement, and overall company vision, to name a few. A vision Let's start with the most general: the vision statement. A vision statement is a brief description of what an organization aims to achieve within a given framework in the future. Typically, this scope is an intangible medium-term or long-term future. As an example, Amerigen Pharmaceuticals publicly states that its vision is "to be at the forefront of [their] industry in delivering complex oral generic products to patients in the markets [they] serve." They then go on to state that "their target products are carefully selected to ensure that [their] resources, expertise and energy are focused on opportunities that can deliver the most benefit to all of our stakeholders." And finally that they “rely on great science and passionate execution to realize [these] opportunities.” In these three short sentences, Amerigen has indicated a number of things. Their vision is a long term vision that is continually implemented in the short term. It is also perpetually inaccessible in that it will never be finished. The company will always have a goal in seeking to bring its products to the patients it serves, and everyone who represents it or knows it will understand that it seeks to do so in a precise and utilitarian approach. A Mission Statement As we zoom in on the scope of our purpose, we find a mission statement. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay Although an organization's vision is an overall vision of what it aims to achieve, its mission statement rather indicates what is her goal and why she seeks these goals. final objectives. It is said that a mission statement actually serves two purposes. The first is to elucidate what is fundamentally sought by the organizers of the company itself. By bringing vision, mission, and ethics together in organizations, these organizers can come together to discuss their roles and responsibilities in their mission statement. The second objective of a mission statement is then to communicate it both to future members of the organization and to stakeholders. He will express his understanding of the needs of communities and how his own skills, resources and capabilities can align to meet those needs. That is, in concise terms, mission statements define the nature, purpose and role of organizations, focus resources and guide planning (Keeling, 2013). A mission statement unifies the members or employees under its responsibility. It is a public statement about the company's goals and how and in what ways those goals can be achieved. In this regard, a mission statement functions as a prioritization of which issues to focus on. Because of its potentially public nature, it allows outsiders to know and understand where an organization is coming from philosophically and what it hopes to achieve. A Code of Ethics Zooming even further, we arrive at a code of ethics. It is the core on which the others rest. Generally speaking, the code of ethics indicates how the differentOrganizational entities must face various situations. Of course, its breadth and length can be as concise or comprehensive as the organization desires. But why have a code of ethics? Business is not always black and white. There are many gray areas that present themselves over time and without proper guidance, members of an organization could lose ground or differ on how to handle what can even become common gray areas. These inconsistencies create avoidable stress for both the public and the entities directly involved in the organization. Unity These three elements, vision, mission and a code of ethics, come together to form the backbone of an organization's purpose, scope and response. They could help predict why a company will decide to expand into a new technology or area, or not to expand. It helps externals and internals understand the vision, mission and ethics of organizations to understand the course of action that an organization can undertake. This understanding reinforces reliability and comfort for stability and longevity. However, these questions are not always as simple as they seem. Ethics is not always simple, black or white. For example, in criminology, there are two main categories of crimes. These are those that all societies agree are false, known in Latin as "mala in se", and those that are considered false only because society considers it to be such, known as “mala prohibita”. This simple distinction between these two criminal categories already raises questions. There are certainly ethical concerns that we all agree should be considered misguided and abandoned. But are there any concerns that are false just because our society says so? What if our society deems it acceptable but another society does not? If the organization becomes an international organization, are disagreements with the ethics of others only rectified on their soil? Furthermore, Marques indirectly poses the question of whether a business should follow consequentialism (utilitarian approach) or a deontological approach. In consequentialism, you would be expected to do what is best for the greatest number. From a business perspective, this could be rephrased as what's best for the business. However, with an ethical approach, you would do what is considered "right", regardless of any sanctions that might exist for doing so. To illustrate how implausible this can sometimes be, if one followed ethics to the extreme, one would never lie. When it comes to a code of ethics, Marques leaves the reader with several points to consider. What one considers ethical may be based on one's cultural background. This could lead to certain philosophies and practices being difficult to implement for today's diversified international businesses. Returning to the opposition between the utilitarian (consequentialist) and the deontologist, a simple dilemma deserves to be examined. Should a company lay off 10% of its workforce to save the remaining 90%, showing itself to be universalist, or should it refrain from doing so, even if it risks putting everything in danger, and show itself to be ethical? Vision, Mission and Ethics in Organizations Conclusion In the aforementioned vision of Amerigen Pharmaceuticals, they indicated that they wanted their resources, expertise and energy to be focused on opportunities that could bring the most benefit to all their stakeholders. Is this.