'Henry VIII broke from Rome because he wanted to increase his own power.' Explain why you agree or disagree with this point of view. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay It could be interpreted that Henry VIII left Rome because he wanted to increase his personal power, but there are two main points of contradictory views. Firstly, Henry realized the wealth of the Church and decided to appropriate this provision for himself, and secondly, he was driven by his need for annulment. Overall, it can be argued that the need for an annulment was the most important factor. One of the main reasons for the break with Rome was Henry VIII's quest for power. This is demonstrated by his attempts at conquest to claim parts of France and expand his kingdom, and by his desire to be seen as an "imperial king". Such a monarch would not accept a power greater than his own, nor to be contradicted by a greater force in matters of annulment. This anger was said to have been supported by the Collectanea satis copiosa, compiled by Cranmer, which undermined the role of the Pope in the English Church and referred to an Erastian tradition according to which the King of England was accepted as head of the English Church. However, this desire to overthrow the power of the Pope would never have come about without the need for an annulment, making this quest for power more of a means than a motive. We see that his desires later transformed into a lust for power, through the Act of Supremacy of 1534 which appointed him "the sole supreme head of the Church of England", confirming the previous acts and making him the head indisputable. this power grab is seen only as a different approach and not the reason for the breakup. Originally, by charging the ecclesiastics with the praemunire and the Act of the Annates of 1532, Henry sought to modify the pope's decision by exerting financial pressure on him. If it had worked, he would undoubtedly have been happy and would not have needed to seek power, so he would not have broken with Rome. There, the need for annulment was the reason why Henry VIII broke with papal authority in England. This is the key starting point from which all other grounds arise – if he had not needed the annulment, he would never have begun the journey that led to his separation from Rome. Marking this motive as the beginning of all things clearly proves that this is the only reason behind the breakup, no matter how Henry tried to achieve it, the reason he employed these methods was because he needed to 'a cancellation. It was the trigger, the cause, at the heart of every act and decision until he finally declared the marriage invalid in the Deed of Succession of 1534. The final possibility is that Henry was motivated by a need for money. He was a king accustomed to a lavish lifestyle and, after twenty years of reign, the royal coffers would no doubt be depleted. During the annulment process, Henry would no doubt have realized the immense wealth of the Church – by fining those accused of praemunire he received a large sum of money – but it was little more only a marginal benefit. He did not abolish papal authority in England for property; he originally interrupted the annates to put pressure on the pope, not to advance his own wealth. Although this would have attracted Henry as an added bonus and an easy source of income, it was not a motive. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized item now).