Table of contentsIntroductionDiscussionConclusionReferencesIntroductionPrejudice, stereotypes and discrimination remain the three major problems in today's world. In an increasingly diverse society, prejudice and discrimination become normalized and synchronized in our daily lives and continue to make a difference based on race, sex, ethnicity or gender. Prejudice is considered an unfounded and generally unconstructive attitude towards members of a group. Common attributes of prejudice primarily include negative feelings, labeled beliefs in addition to a predisposition to marginalize members of a group (Fiske, 2018). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay However, some definitions of prejudice given by social scientists generally differ, with many agreeing that it is prejudices, which are generally not very constructive towards members of a certain group. The following will discuss whether the formation of prejudice is inevitable in the context of human society. DiscussionPrejudice is considered a generally unjustified or inappropriate negative attitude toward an individual, based solely on the individual's membership in that specific social group. For example, an individual may have a biased perspective toward a particular race or gender category that is generally considered sexist. On the other hand, discrimination is considered to be generally negative behavior or actions toward an individual or group of individuals, specifically based on gender categories, ethnicity, and social class (Marsden and Haag 2016). Liberman, Woodward, and Kinzler (2017) cited an example of racial discrimination, which highlights segregation or disconnection, which had been recognized as a system of ethnic segregation, applied in South Africa from 1948 to 1994, where people Non-whites were not allowed to vote and lived in segregated communities. While, in recent times, women often face discrimination in the workplace, while men tend to face discrimination and prejudice in family environments. According to Billig (1985), it is clear to identify two varied perspectives of prejudice in the field of cognitive social psychology. In attributing relevance to a design, the way biased individuals think is primarily different from the way open-minded people think. On the other hand, one can identify a perspective that challenges this distinction by asserting that rather than viewing prejudice as a distinct pattern of thinking, it asserts that all thoughts tend to emphasize acts of bias. However, regardless of the conflicting views among these two understandings of prejudice, these explanations can be found in Allport's exceptional work "The Nature of Prejudice." Meanwhile, the authors shared similar thoughts with Allport, stating that the importance of categorization is linked to the cognitive process. Furthermore, Billig (1985), based on previous studies, assessed that categorization is a major value of reasoning which tends to allow humans to structure themselves and to provide coherence to the overall understanding of people and the world. social world. a general outcome of thinking rather than a specific type of perception, we can then observe an inevitability effect in which individuals are confronted with acts of bigotry untilwhat they think that way. Such theoretical acceptance related to prejudice and prejudice can be identified in the field of social psychology. On the other hand, social dominance theory emphasizes individual variation in whether individuals view intergroup associations as a contest in which groupings suit to subjugate others. Leonardelli and Toh (2015) shared similar thoughts and noted that building from the perceptions of moreIn a few decades, differences in individual attitudes toward the idea of ​​categorizing prejudice and racism all seem to shine through among American researchers whose specialty is likely to reduce past differences. Hogg and Vaughan (1995) focus on examples from radically different periods of colonization. in a country that has stimulated cultural topics to surface more easily in the United States than in other countries. It included a legitimate and self-evident philosophy of equality in which the American national emphasis rested on individualism, which cited responsibility for prejudice on people in addition to the rights of individual independence over the distinction of ethnic groups. According to Marsden and Haag (2016), social dominance theory with the integration of individual differences perspective emphasized on repeated topics in the exploration of social prejudice, which was considered the extent of competition between groups . Such concern is a recurring theme in the interpretation of intergroup prejudices and predispositions. At the same time, according to Fiske (2018), theoretical understanding based on functional associations generally points to competition and the resulting perceived intimidation as primary causes of intergroup prejudice and favoritism. Furthermore, a realistic theory of group conflict established that the groups' apparent rivalry for resources was consequent on the determination to reduce the possibility of obtaining additional groups for possessions. While emphasizing explicit and implicit bias, Leonardelli and Toh (2015) asserted that marginalization tends to occur. in a number of groups in general, where acts of labeling and prejudice are seen as an intrapsychic manifestation. Such an event implies that they take place within a person and are likely to vary not only in terms of clarity compared to other individuals, but also in terms of the level of knowledge and ideas gathered by the individual who activates acts of classification and prejudice. Previous research has claimed that previously labeling and bigotry were understood as particular responses associated with beliefs, principles, and approaches that people tend to think they possess and, therefore, regulate these feelings in their face. On the contrary, to these obvious, conscious and thoughtful feelings. events, hidden acts, prejudices and stereotypes show a deficit of consideration and deliberate activation. Conversely, there was an integrated agreement that inherent manifestations of attitudes and classification exist and constantly anticipate certain behavioral patterns, which tend to regulate apparent behavioral patterns as well as labeling. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a Custom EssayConclusionTo conclude, while examining explanations for the emergence of labeling, stereotyping, and prejudice, researchers have discovered various ways in which prejudice can be focused,. 2019].