-
Essay / Animal Law: Understanding the importance of keeping animals safe
For the introduction of these animal rights, I will first give the definition of the rights as a whole. Right is a moral or legal right to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way. Because people's rights are something we deserve, especially when we talk about human rights. Human rights are rights that every person is born with and retains throughout their life, regardless of race, gender, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion or any other other status. These rights include things like freedom of speech, the right to marriage and family, freedom of belief and religion, and many others. Human rights have been something that people have fought for throughout history, and given their lives for because they believed in equality and that everyone deserved to benefit from these rights. human rights. But do rights stop at humans? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Rights are something that most people think of as things that everyone deserves, but there are several types of rights; two of them being vested rights and human rights. Acquired rights are rights that are given or acquired. An example of this would be certain licenses such as those received by hunters. This permit gives them the right to hunt provided they respect the law. People think that there is nothing wrong with hunting as long as they don't hunt the animal to extinction, they are not entirely wrong. Hunting is acceptable when it is necessary to obtain resources or when an animal overpopulates a certain area and hunters help keep that population low. Much more often, hunters disrupt the habitat in which they hunt by killing the animals needed in those locations. There are animals all over the world who suffer because they are not cared for properly. There are people who believe that they can treat animals however they want simply because they are not human beings. Animals are not capable of communicating and defending themselves, but they are nevertheless capable of emotions, pain and suffering. Pet owners also have rights when it comes to owning an animal. They have the right to sell or keep their animals. The problem is, depending on who they are selling the animal to, the animal may not be treated or cared for the way it is supposed to be. Many people simply give away animals when they don't want them to get rid of them and often they don't check or see if the person they are giving their animals to is capable or caring for the animal or if she used to hurt them. The owners of these animals are the first step in ensuring that these animals are taken care of. Animals are sentient creatures and are not capable of defending themselves, so it is our job to defend them from abuse and cruelty. Animal rights have been an ongoing issue in society since I can remember. They became prevalent at some point in the past and never went away. Issues only seem to matter to people when a big story breaks about some animals being mistreated, a company is accused or proven of something regarding animal abuse, or when it is announced that an animal has become an endangered species. endangered or has disappeared. . But once people see what is happening, they take no action to stop what is happening; Andjust like that, the topic of animal rights and the topic of how animals aren't treated properly disappears until next time. Nowadays, people like to call themselves “woke.” This makes them aware of social justice issues or things that others are not aware of. People like to be seen as social justice warriors, but often let the topic of animal rights go over their heads. Animal rights should be something more widely discussed in terms of social justice because ultimately, they are living creatures too. This topic, as mentioned before, has been and is constantly brought up and because of this things have been done about animal rights, but we are far from being finished and solving the problem. Animals are nothing less than humans simply because they are not as “evolved” as us and have the right to live without being abused or killed. Animal rights is currently considered an ethical issue because there are disagreements about how animals should be treated. The argument for animal rights is that animals should be treated well and with respect, animals feel pain and suffering and just like humans they do not deserve to be subjected to that for any reason. reason whatsoever, because all types of life must be respected. Some may think that the animal rights movement is trying to give animals the same rights as humans, like marriage and the right to vote, which is ridiculous, it's just the treatment they receive. Animals, just like humans, have some of the same rights as us. . These rights concern how they are treated. Animals should be respected and cared for because they are living creatures and deserve to live like us. Animal rights should be supported like other causes, even if it doesn't seem important, but even if it isn't, it can't be something that stays on the back burner so that we can get there because that ultimately there are living creatures who are abused, tortured, abandoned and killed. Advances in animal rights include the Humane Slaughter Act, the Twenty-Eight Hour Law, and animal welfare. The term animal welfare is used to describe the welfare of animals and the way they are treated. This has different views from different people because everyone has their own definition of how animals should be treated. Jennifer Everett explains in her journal that although everyone has a different understanding of the term, most people agree that "all members of a certain class of animals are properly treated as direct objects of moral concern." , but differ as theories of the right or wrong of actions affecting animals. members of this class. Continually, laws and regulations have been adopted regarding animal rights. However, when examined, they can seem rather useless since most of the time, these laws and legislations are very poorly enforced. According to the National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS), the Welfare Act is a law "established in 1966 in response to growing concern about dogs and cats used in research, including a large number of reported thefts of dogs and cats.” for use in research institutes. The problem with the Welfare Act is that the animals it protects are very specific and exclude a much larger number of animals used in research institutes. Since the lawwas promulgated, the number of protected animals increased, but at the same time, new exclusions were added, such as that targeting farm animals. The Social Welfare Act can also be compared to the Humane Slaughter Act. The Humane Slaughter Act was originally known as the Humane Slaughter Methods Act. “Originally passed in 1958, the law that is enforced today by the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) was passed as the Humane Slaughter Act of 1978. This The law requires the proper treatment and humane handling of all food animals slaughtered in USDA-inspected slaughterhouses. The law, although it seems useful, also has many exclusions such as the slaughter of poultry, being one of the only laws protecting the humane slaughter of animals so that they can die without pain, it fails no only chickens but also other animals which are also excluded or ignored. Another law aimed at protecting animals is the twenty-eight hour law. The University of Michigan Animal Law and History Center explains the law as follows: “This federal law addresses the transportation of animals, including those raised for food or food production, across state lines. The law provides that animals cannot be transported by "rail carrier, express carrier or common carrier" (except by air or sea) for more than 28 consecutive hours without being unloaded for five hours to rest, drink water and food. Although the law is helpful in protecting transported animals, it makes no effort to control the conditions in which animals are transported, sometimes resulting in animals being transported in poor conditions. These laws, however, attempt, to some extent, to help do so. are not enough to ensure the safety of animals. This is why there are still people fighting for animal rights. These people are a big help and part of a great movement, but we need more people to make a point and get the things we think are not only necessary but deserved. There are many ways to help the movement and many organizations can join. Unfortunately, many people are afraid or nervous about joining these organizations because in the past these organizations have been labeled extremist for doing things to bring attention to this cause. Although they do it with good intentions, their actions are considered offensive or unnecessary because there are more ways to do things and instead of doing things peacefully to gain attention, these organizations usually opt to the latter and do things that will attract people's attention. even if it causes people to disagree with what they are doing. Two examples mentioned in an essay entitled Earth Wars: PETA, Sea Shepherds, Greenpeace and Ethics by Kim Pewitt-Jones are linguistic choices made by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and the actions carried out by The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. to stop the Japanese from killing whales in the South Antarctic Ocean in 2000. The reason PETA's language choices in the ads got them in trouble was because they compared animal abuse and use of leather to horrible events that happened. in history. “Holocaust on Your Plate” and “End Slavery” were used to gain support from African-Americans and Jews around the world, but these.