Table of ContentsIntroductionHistory of Exclusionary ZoningOverview of the ProblemConclusionIntroductionThe issue of poverty has affected many families across the country and has affected the educational system of schools in countless counties across the states -United. The United States faces a widespread, self-inflicted problem that boils down to concentrated poverty. Neighborhoods with concentrated poverty, which have a poverty rate of around 40 percent or higher, lack the resources to provide quality schools, job opportunities, safer neighborhoods and access to substantial health care. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Yet there has been an identifiable trend of declining public policy and increasing numbers of poor neighborhoods across the United States. Exclusionary zoning is defined as an oft-mentioned policy that keeps affordable housing out of the neighborhood due to land use and building code requirements. Although this practice is legal, it is unethical due to its harmful effects that prevent low-income families from having the same access to education and employment opportunities found in wealthier neighborhoods. Exclusionary zoning is a municipal problem illustrated in Montgomery County. through the school district's approval of school zoning and its effect on families' ability to acquire the same educational resources as other areas of Clarksville, Tennessee that are not as poor. History of Exclusionary Zoning The history of exclusionary zoning dates back to the early decades of the 20th century and became a conduit for racial discrimination. Exclusionary zoning allowed white neighborhoods to thrive through the protection of the law barring minorities from settling in their communities. At a time when racial discrimination was protected by law, exclusionary zoning was not identified as a problem pitting one class system against another or allowing the poor to acquire resources necessary for success. in 1917, the United States Supreme Court received its first case challenging exclusionary zoning through a transaction between two individuals; a white male and a black male. During this transaction, the white individual sold a home to a black individual, but due to the ordinance that was passed in that particular city, the black individual was not legally allowed to live in an area predominantly white. Because of this order, the Supreme Court would consider whether or not this violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court's Buchanan v. Warley case would confirm that this state's ordinance violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. and was deemed unconstitutional. Although this case was a pivotal moment in the history of minorities and races of color, examples of exclusionary zoning still exist to this day and can be recognized in the school zoning of many county districts across the United States. . Demographics Clarksville, Tennessee, has a population of 146,281 people with a median age of 29 and a median household income of $48,675 with an estimated growth between 2015 and 2016 of approximately 1.85% in population size and 3.68% in household income. The population of Clarksville, TN is 59.4% White, 22.1% Black, and 10.8% Hispanic, with 11% speaking a non-English language and approximately 97.5% of residents being Citizens of the United States. Clarksville's population has approximately 16.6% of its residents living in thepoverty, which is higher than the national average of 14%. Due to the immense poverty problem that exists throughout Montgomery County, I decided to focus on the social problem of school zoning which has caused an imbalance in the educational resources that children receive.Overview of the problem The Fair Housing Act was enacted to prohibit discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, and marital status, but did not prohibit discrimination based on class. This was used as an escape from the discrimination that confined low-income people to certain neighborhoods. I've noticed that there are areas of Montgomery County that are poorer than others, and the schools in those areas are a reflection of the poverty their residents face. Before the Montgomery County School Board approved the rezoning proposal, parents could enroll their children in any school, regardless of their residential address. However, once the school board approved the rezoning proposal, the board declared that a child must enroll in a school in Montgomery County that is within their residential zone. School zoning is a concrete example of the effects of exclusionary zoning and how it can prevent children from receiving the same educational resources as others. Pete Rodrigue expressed in his article on exclusionary zoning that it limits poor families' access to a good school and is even linked to harming the academic success of low-income students (2016). School zoning cannot be seen as a disadvantage to students who attend the school. Montgomery County schools, but many factors contribute to the issue of school zoning and its effect on student academic success. The four main factors contributing to the social problem of school zoning are: lower income for schools located in poorer residential areas, lower academic performance percentile for K-12 students, exacerbated socioeconomic segregation by residence patterns. division by both race and income, limiting strategies to increase socioeconomic school integration. School zoning also limits the school choices of low-income families by relying on the factor that the quality of a student's school is determined by their zip code and by emphasizing the fact that because their parents live in “shit” neighborhoods, a child has to go to “shit” schools. The disparities I have discovered in this social issue are related to socioeconomic class, ability level, and even race. Exclusionary zoning suggests that children can only attend elementary, middle, and high school located within their residential area. However, if the child lives in a poorer part of town, for example New Providence or 41-A in Clarksville, it is visible that that child's school receives less funding than areas like Sango or Rossview. A child's education should not be inferior to that of any other child simply because their school is on one side of town and/or their parents' income is lower than that of a child. other child. The school zoning proposal should not have been successfully adopted by Montgomery County school districts in Clarksville, Tennessee. Each year, the school district receives a certain amount of money for its budget to distribute among the schools in its district. Montgomery County schools were to receive more than $3. $5 million in growth funds in the ?.