blog




  • Essay / The Paris Peace Accords: Compromises to End the Vietnam War Harini Venkata Chalapathi

    THE PARIS PEACE ACCORDS: Compromises to End the Vietnam WarHarini VenkatachalapathiSay no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayWorld History Honors Period 2 Mr. Coburn 11/18/18 “Was it the bad decisions made by civilian leaders, hostile media and the anti-war movement, or was it doomed from the start? » (The Bad War)The Paris Peace Accords were signed on January 27, 1973 to end the Vietnam War. This resulted in the establishment of a ceasefire which took effect on January 28, but the war continued even after the ceasefire as South Vietnamese troops continued to receive aid American even if American ground troops had left. It began as an agreement between the government of North and South Vietnam, the Republic of Vietnam and the United States, but now the Paris Peace Accords have gone down in history as a deliberate fraud in every respect .Thesis: Since the ceasefire ended and American ground troops left South Vietnam, it could be said that the Paris Peace Accords were a fraud and were not taken seriously and the war ended. continued; The Paris Peace Accords were considered a joke from the start and their result was to take this large-scale war to a completely new level. What happened during the peace conferences, no one knows except those who attended the conference and those who saw the hundreds of hours of recorded Allied war councils. The expected outcomes of the peace talks were simple: a ceasefire is reached, all U.S. ground troops leave Vietnamese territory, there is a compromise between North and South Vietnam, all troops stop fighting and the war ends. Nothing that was planned happens, but maybe the first things have happened: the ceasefire is canceled and American ground troops leave, but North and South Vietnam are completely unaware ceasefire and bring the war into a whole new phase. "In June, it was known that Abrams, named the next Army Chief of Staff, would soon leave Vietnam. The troops he commanded were down to 69,000, and the requirement was that d 'by July 1st they be reduced by another 20,000' (343, Sorley). American troops were already leaving Vietnam and the peace talks simply gave them the opportunity to completely get out of the situation they found themselves in. While this is true, it is not the only consequence of the peace talks. For those who participated in the peace talks it was all a joke, they all tried to see how they could benefit from it and most likely forgot or didn't care about the main reason for the talks of peace took place. First and foremost, North Vietnam's main plan was to encircle Saigon, and they knew that if they did just that, defeating South Vietnam would be easier than before. "The fall of Saigon in late April 1945 surprised no one. The fall of South Vietnam so quickly, with almost no resistance, shocked the aggressive North Vietnamese army and the world as well." (286, Steinman). No one expected South Vietnam to give up fighting once its capital was surrounded, however, "South Vietnam's leadership was never good at the best of times" (286, Steinman) as well. evacuation of American troops caused S. Vietnam almost abandoned..