The generation gap is caused by rapid social change in human society. Humans, with their different experiences, occupying different positions, will eventually give rise to conflicts within the community. Along with globalization, modern culture in developing countries is causing human society to evolve at a rapid pace, either in its contacts with the environment or with other beings, which can eventually lead to many long-term consequences. My work, which is a fantastic graphic novel, is a portrait of our world with all these current issues concerning the generation gap. With generational conflict at the center of the whole story. It questions the attitudes, priorities and unwritten issues in which our behavior is formed in today's world. I knock to convey this feeling of respect and understanding between humans and humans. On the other hand, my goal is to remind us to slow down, appreciate and reconnect with the world around us, almost forgotten in today's modern world. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay When it comes to the generation gap, it seems that different generations are facing conflicts in many aspects of life due to modernization. Srudevi K Patil (2014) examined how the generation gap reflects the conflict between the modern and traditional sections of modern Indian society. He found that as education and modernization expand, both generations are at risk of either suffering from cultural backwardness that leaves them behind in areas of modern life, or of failing to implement part of their traditional orientation. This difference in values, beliefs and mentalities has remained the same in family, marital and recreational life. When the younger generation cherishes its independence, the older people seek to dominate the younger ones. He also found that the expansion of urbanization, literacy, and industrialization resulted in distinctive psychosocial changes in the personality structure of individuals who were exposed to them. For example, despite being aware of the rapid pace of social change, adults do not take this into account when interacting with children. As a result, parents often enforce the social rules and behaviors of their own generation. Thus, generational conflicts arose between generations as a result of modernization. While, according to research, generational conflicts emerged under the pressure of changes in the process of modernization of society. Public perceptions may underestimate its long-term dimensional consequences due to the neglect of these issues in the everyday context. Edward J. Clarke, Mar Preston, Jo Raksin, and Vern L. Bengtson conducted a mail survey to study the dimensions of conflict and its effects on intergenerational parent-older adult relationships. By collecting written comments from parents and their adult children, they gathered data and developed categories that can be used to typify intergenerational conflict. In the end, they identified 6 types of conflicts that emerged: (1) communication and interaction style, (2) habits and lifestyles, (3) child-rearing practices and values , (4) work habits and orientation, (5) politics, religion and ideology, and (6) norms or household maintenance. HeIt was found that there are two most frequent intergenerational conflicts: problems with communication and interaction style emerge in 32% of cases, followed by disagreements over habits and personal choices, mentioned in 32% of responses. The generation gap here seemed much more consistent with the data. However, the frequency distribution of conflict types was not as striking as expected between child and parent groups. The results indicate that the conflict between these two generations may be more widespread than commonly thought. During their discussion, the potential for debilitating effects of conflict is clear. Maintaining a conflictual relationship results in a continued drain on emotional resources and eventually turns into a “long-term, bad relationship.” However, it has become apparent that the long-term consequences of generational conflicts do not stop there, increasing the balance between humans and nature. . Gaia Vince (2012) examined human consumption habits after the Great Acceleration. The rapid increase in human activity has led to an increase in everything: carbon dioxide, water consumption, the number of cars, deforestation and consumption. As humanity's life is now more comfortable than that of the average human a century ago, people are buying things they may not need. While this excessive consumption habit may help governments overrun their economies, it harms the environment. “In nature, “resources” are recycled. But the scale at which humans are using resources is too fast for natural systems to handle. » On the other hand, Stanley Knick (2010) analyzed the disadvantages of the transition from traditional culture to modern culture, in terms of sustainability of the living environment and emotional connection. The transition from rural to urban life, which occurs mainly due to the development of mechanized means of production, is at the heart of the transition from traditional to modern culture. He found that the constant flow of refugees from modern culture is a sign of a hole in modern culture. Modern culture, despite its power of seduction and its power, has not succeeded in guaranteeing human relationships. By comparing the differences between the two cultures in various aspects: the system, their beliefs in power and relationships with nature and the living environment, the article exposes how modernization has changed the way of life and the mentality of the humanity. In addition, the change in behavior and consumption habits has had various consequences endangering the sustainability of today's world. However, the question must be asked: do changes and differences in values, habits and behaviors between generations make it impossible to decode this generational conflict? Despite the uniqueness of each individual and their different standards, human beings still share some commonalities throughout their lives. in the same society with a rapid pace of evolution. Alex Smith (2017) questions the possibility of bridging the generation gap. The growing gap in levels of Conservative support between over-65s and 25-34 year-olds (from 11% to 34%) has reinforced the image of divided generations in the UK. Although the two groups have many differences of opinion from one another, they share many commonalities. By addressing their common problem: loneliness and coping in a rapidly changing world, the article charted a path to solving this age gap. Although many older people are deeply rooted in their communities, they have few connections, while the situation is..