"I realized that the average opinions of groups are often more accurate than those of most individuals in the group. (Kenneth Arrow,) Stanford University Today, crowds have become a more reliable source of information for collect data, find information and/or make important business decisions Society is faced with business and personal decisions and increasingly relies on the help of crowds Say no to plagiarism Get a tailor-made essay on “. Why "violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay In 1906, Sir Francis Galton discovered something exceptional when he looked at the estimates of the weight of an ox of 800 people, the individual figures. were everywhere, but the normal figured out how to get it wrong by less than a tenth of that weight. It was no accident. It's a case of "group insight", a marvel with suggestions and false impressions. in our organized life more than a century later. People use the opinions of others, especially those on the Internet, to form their own opinions. guess or try to find a reliable answer when facing certain situations that may be difficult to get answers on your own and we tend to trust this opinion while seeing it from other people's point of view. I tend to get other people's opinions instead of just one person's. I usually ask about five people's opinions when I'm trying to make the right decision about something. Then I would come back and evaluate everyone's suggestions, then make a final decision based on majority rules. If 3 out of 5 people have the same answer of doing the right thing, I would go with all 3 people. Networked digital media present new challenges for individuals who want to find reliable information. At the same time, society's dependence on information available only or primarily via the Internet is increasing. I would like to show how and why digitally networked communication environments are changing traditional notions of trust, and present research that examines how information consumers make judgments about the credibility and accuracy of information they encounter in line. Based on my information, I discovered this about using cognitive heuristics in credibility assessment. Results from recent studies are used to illustrate the types of cognitive heuristics that information consumers employ to determine which sources and information to trust online. When I rely on reliable information, use different web browsers, and don't rely on a single source, I tend to click one or two links reading about a topic to find a reliable answer . I would start with dates I know first, then I would check the dates of the articles I used, then I would check the credentials, and finally I would not trust my first source. I would check multiple websites to find the information I needed, and if multiple websites say the exact same thing, I would go with that answer. I found the agenda for future research necessary to better understand the role and influence of cognitive heuristics in assessing credibility in computer-mediated communication contexts. Author James Surowiecki "convincingly argues that, under the right circumstances, it is the crowd that is wiser than even the most intelligent individuals in the world.".