Virtue Ethics and Moral CharacterVirtue ethics suffers from the danger of relativism and too much consideration of an individual's circumstances. By definition, virtue ethics is the emphasis on the character and concern for the life of the individual. A person who follows virtue ethics strives to live like the ideal virtuous person. In addition to this, they also believe that moral decisions should not be made regarding consequences or duties. Because of the ambiguity of “virtues,” virtue ethics is established by the individual. While an individual's virtues may come from other belief systems such as utilitarianism and naturalism, the virtue theorist's fundamental focus on the individual's character and life opens the door to a belief less ambiguous morality: relativism. The relativistic judgment of the quality of a moral decision based on its relativity to culture and personal circumstances arises from the roots of virtue ethics. A relativist can become selfish if he places too much importance on his own situation. This is because the selfish is fundamentally based on self-interest. Virtue ethics can suffer from the drawbacks of both of these belief systems if the individual guided by virtue ethics chooses to overemphasize themselves in relation to a moral decision. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The likelihood of a virtue theorist abusing relativism depends solely on their environment and upbringing. The only principle of relativism is the negation of an absolute universal moral truth. Furthermore, the relativist maintains that moral and ethical propositions are based on societal, cultural, historical, and personal circumstances. Abuse occurs when the virtue theorist places his or her personal circumstances above all other aspects of relativism. The virtue theorist turned relativist believes that the emphasis on character must be supported by self-interest in order for one to become the ideal virtuous person (which is also ambiguous). Therefore, personal circumstances play a major role in cultivating the virtue theorist's abusive relativism. The concept of the ideal virtuous person is based on “what someone should be,” which then leads to “what someone should do.” The danger is that the ideal virtuous person assumes that what they should do is become the kind of person they want to be. Thus, the virtue theorist's desire parallels selfishness's foundation of self-interest. This principle appeals to the virtue theorist turned relativist because it takes into account moral character and personal circumstances through the argument that the true judge of morality is based on the virtues and character of the individual, and not on those of society. The judgment of moral decisions is therefore relative to the individual's self, which is oriented towards a selfish state of mind. The process explained is the process by which virtue ethics can fall into the danger of relativism and too much consideration of an individual's circumstances, that is, selfishness. It is important to focus on the moral quality of a person's actions while also maintaining emphasis on moral quality. of a person's character. A person's actions only apply to the situation presented to them, whereas a person's character is the foundation of any action a person takes in any situation. All actions are related to morality because a decision must be made based on the parties to the.