Table of ContentsThe Realism vs. Liberalism Debate: Similarities and DifferencesConclusionReferenceNeo-realism and neoliberalism attempt to provide "cover laws" or cover a wide variety of actions in a conceptual explanation of causal relationships like the Newtonian law of gravity which describes a certain relationship between all elements (attraction, which is also the DV or effect on another variable) based on mass and distance (independent factors or causal) without taking into account the specific or spectral. The aim of the essay is to briefly explore the similarities and differences between realism and liberalism. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayThe Debate Between Realism and Liberalism: Similarities and DifferencesThe main similarity between these two concepts, which affects how nations should acting, is the way they see the structure of the world. For both realism and liberalism, “a situation of anarchy exists outside the boundaries of government.” This situation occurs because there is no government in the world or a higher institution to control the relations between different states. The state should find ways to live in this anarchic society, and how to do this constitutes a major contrast between realism and liberalism. Realism, like liberalism, sees war as something to be prevented, with morality being a determining factor in the latter's intervention in a conflict. Liberalism assumes that states have a moral obligation to intervene when these principles are violated in the affairs of other states. Such principles should constitute fundamental human rights that everyone in the world should enjoy, regardless of their origin. According to liberalism, ideals such as order, democracy, justice and equality should be defended by states and international institutions if the latter fail in their duty. While realism emphasizes the balance of actions between countries at the system level, liberalism looks to domestic actions created by engaging internal and external pressures (domestic politics is Waltz's second image ). One element of this thinking is that modern democratic regimes are less likely to be at war with each other (economic peace theory). A new formulation of liberalism aims to focus on national behavior or preferences, but to incorporate systemic pressures by influencing national likes and dislikes. Realism does not focus on the centralization of power in foreign affairs, whereas liberalism focuses on the centralization of power. Centralization of power effectively guarantees stability and security. Considering that it is both a qualitative and prescriptive theory or interpretation of international relations rooted in Renaissance Italy, the balance of power is favored. Indeed, it can be argued that the balance of European political powers was an external phenomenon rather than the normal course of events in other international systems. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Paper EssayConclusionOverall, it can be noticed that both realism and liberalism seek to bring a change in the legal system as well as society. As long as all objects have mass and distance, they can, 31(1), 134-164.