In this argument, if “employees have a duty of loyalty to the companies that employ them” is considered the p and “it is rational for employees to expect companies to recognize and fulfill a duty of loyalty to their employees” will be q. It follows that q is false because it is not rational for employees to expect companies to recognize and respect their loyalty to their employees. The logical form ends with no p because “It is false that employees have a duty of loyalty towards the companies which employ them”. We know that this argument is deductively valid, but to show that the conclusion is also true, it must be true that the argument is deductively valid. An example of a deductively valid argument would be: Premise 1) All mammals have four legs; Premise 2) Lions are mammals; Conclusion) Lions therefore have four feet. Premise 1 of this argument is true, mammals have four legs, premise 2 is also true, lions are mammals, and therefore the conclusion is also true that lions have four legs. With these true premises leading to a true conclusion, help us understand