“Is Google Making Our Society Stupid or Helping Us Instead?” » In "Is Google Making Us Stupid", Nicholas Carr's main idea that he tries to make throughout the book is that the Internet is the main source of information and ideas that we, as 'humans, let's use. He goes on to explain how this affects our abilities. as people to focus on a single thing or idea, and he says humans have difficulty reading while staying focused because of the Internet and the distractions it brings. He then goes on and attempts to explain how the way information is presented on the internet and how it has changed the way we act as a society and think as a whole. He does this by using many different methods and ways of thinking, he uses anecdotes and uses his observations to try to persuade the audience that the Internet has been bad for our thinking and learning processes. Overall, I believe his argument is not effective due to his choice of sources, but also the tone of his voice throughout his article. Reading the article, Carr explains how the Internet has helped, but at the same time he also explains the disadvantages of the Internet. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayCarr begins his article with a quote from 2001: A Space Odyssey. He talks about the quote and explains the quote by talking about "how it's humans who rewire the computer." He then compares and explains how computers rewired his own brain. Before reading this article, I didn't know who he was, so I ironically went to Google and searched who he was and what he was known for. “Nicholas Carr is an acclaimed writer on technology, economics, and culture whose books have been translated into more than twenty-five languages.” “He is a visiting professor in Richmond at Williams College. Carr is also a well-known author, his most recent book “The Shallows”. Throughout his article it feels like he relies heavily on his fame to convince readers of his views and opinions as he uses a lot of his own opinions and views quite frequently to help prove his point. To be completely honest I can see why he would do this because he is a well qualified expert in this subject but what if I didn't know who he was or didn't look up who he was before reading this article , then a decent portion of his article would not be effective. After expressing his opinions and ideas, he goes on to talk about his friend's experiences with his views. After talking to his friends about their experience reading books, he discovered that his friends had difficulty reading an entire book. This way of thinking probably wouldn't work with just anyone because anyone can ask their friends this question, but this way of thinking works for him because he has authority, and I guess his friends are smart if he is friends with them. Without Carr, his argument probably wouldn't be very well made. Overall, he used his own ideas and opinions to prove his point. As I continued reading Carr's article, I discovered that another thing he does in his article is that he uses observations and he noticed that in magazines and different articles, editors and writers have I added more little bits and summaries of different parts of magazines to help the reader understand what the whole story was about and hence they think it's because of the internet and-3.