blog




  • Essay / Rhetorical Analysis of Kristof's Article “Food for The Soul”

    In the article “Food For the Soul,” human rights advocate and two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Nicholas Kristof discussed of the profits of traditional family farms compared to modern farms. industrial agriculture. In his article, Kristof inspires readers to accept his ideas and take his side in agricultural debates by focusing on telling nostalgic stories about his childhood on his family farm in Oregon, using metaphors and choosing vivid words with emotional emphasis. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay At the beginning of the passage, it mentions the increased use of modern cultivation techniques that are of no concern to human life. It uses a one-sentence paragraph to describe the transition from modern industrial agriculture to traditional family farms. Here, with a metaphor, he emphasizes that modern industrial agriculture is harmful and “has no soul.” In this passage he tried to explain the loss of vital components of our diet and the spread of microbes which create difficulties for the healthy standard of living. He wants to scare his audience by illustrating the consequences of excessive use of antibiotics which lead to "superbugs" which are resistant to the effect of antibiotics. It is therefore unproductive and unsuccessful. Kristof goes on to motivate the reader to use family farming products rather than industrial farming when he uses Michael Pollen's research to prove his point that diversity in agriculture is essential and is given by family farms and not through industrial agriculture. . He indicates that the large production of cereals results in a “monoculture”. Michael Pollen explains that two-thirds of our calories come from just four crops, which goes against variety. “Monoculture in the field leads to monocultures in our food. Fast food culture and obesity are linked to the transformation of family farms into industrial agriculture. when he placed a chicken egg in a goose's nest. In the end, the chicken's behavior was obvious and understandable. Education affects the “soul”. As a result, crop cultivation affects quality. The better the crop, the better the fruit. Additionally, Kristof gives the example of one of his old high school friends, Bob Bansen, who with 225 Jersey dairy cows competes with 20,000-cow dairy plants. He uses this example to prove to readers that there is still hope. If a small producer can do it, why can't others do it? He thus wants to convince the reader to support small traditional producers. The author tells us that Bob Bansen names all his cows and that they are his family's friends. This shows that he treats his croaks like pets. While “a cow means nothing” to the big newspapers, as Bob says, it shows that small, traditional producers are much more environmentally friendly and contribute to financial sustainability. With the help of these examples, the author wanted to emphasize that modern industrial agriculture where only profit and yield is missing something vital like a healthy and high standard of living. When the author describes his farm as inefficient, he is not saying that the family farm is effortless. In his opinion, this requires more effort and finances, but it will pay off with good health. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized item now..