-
Essay / Aphrodite and Eros and Aphrodite filiform: a comparative study of two works of art
In selecting the artworks I wanted to compare, I came across a few options that I liked. I decided to choose Aphrodite and Eros as well as Filiform Aphrodite. The two statues are obviously meant to represent Aphrodite but are completely different. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Aphrodite and Eros is a seven and a quarter inch tall terracotta statue that has been painted. Some of the paint is worn off but the color remains. It was made in the 3rd century BC. Aphrodite sits holding a winged baby Eros in her left arm and a rattle in her right hand. The throne she sits on is quite plain and simple, but it is large in size for a chair. There is a thick pillow under her, which she is sitting on. She has her head tilted down and to the left, looking at Eros. Aphrodite's hair looks like coarse wire pulled back, under a small cap. She wears a long draped dress and her feet stick out underneath and rest on a small footstool. Her left foot is a little further forward than her right, almost representing walking pose. His right arm is a little too thick to be naturalistic, but otherwise his features are humanistic and naturalistic. Eros' face resembles that of a porcelain doll and is rather stoic. The rattle that Aphrodite is holding looks like a ball with a dowel rod running through it. The filiform Aphrodite is a bronze statue made in the 4th century BC. Aphrodite is extremely elongated and her body and features are not naturalistic. The most naturalistic part of her is her face. Its eyes are almond shaped and its mouth appears to frown or have a frowny face when resting. She has no ears, they are probably covered by her hair which makes it look like she is carrying a basket on her head. Aphrodite's breasts and knees look like peas stuck to her body. Its arms are attached to its sides and resemble penguin flippers. Her feet resemble horse hooves and the only depiction of her wearing clothing is a horizontal line just above her feet. She has no silhouette or distinctive features that truly identify her as a woman, other than her polka-dot-like breasts. Aphrodite and Eros as well as the Spindly Aphrodite are Greek sculptures depicting the same Greek goddess. The hair of both Aphrodite figures is shown pulled back in a bun, under a bonnet or other head covering. Aphrodite is depicted in both sculptures with almond-shaped eyes and an oval face. In both works of art, Aphrodite does not have a recognizable toe on her feet. Although we don't know the artist of any of the sculptures, we do know that each artist was trying to tell a story. We know that their art represents the period, themselves and the location in Greece. I think it's fascinating to see the difference between the two works of art that were created only a hundred years apart. Not only are the sculptures created from different mediums, but they don't even appear to depict the same person. While the spindly Aphrodite is stretched like an elongated pole with a head, Aphrodite and Eros are clearly a woman recognizable only as Aphrodite since she is holding the winged Eros. Aphrodite and Eros are seated but skinny Aphrodite is standing. Aphrodite and Eros were painted with lots of color and sculpted to show detail and have a naturalistic look, unlike the spindly Aphrodite which was meant to be simplistic focusing on her.