Given the global tragedies and massacres that have taken place in today's society, what is your position on the death penalty? This option is still available in 31 out of 50 states. For more than 50 years, no one in the United States has been executed for crimes other than murder in practice. However, since 2008, the United States Supreme Court has rejected the use of the death penalty for any crime for which death is not presented. Is the execution of a murderer itself murder? Is there a line where it is accepted that one life because one life is justified? Society is now morally blinded by those who oppose capital punishment. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay I believe it is necessary to execute a person who commits or threatens the community, especially when the condemned themselves do not feel no remorse. Society has become morally blinded, and those who oppose capital punishment start with the expense, overpopulation, mental health issues, and innocence. Over the years, homicides and violence have increased in the United States. The majority of humans are generally afraid of death itself. This becomes an uncomfortable topic when brought up in conversation. This is a delicate question when speaking to someone who has lost a loved one. If every murderer who killed was automatically sentenced to death, would homicides decrease? Is this an appropriate scenario where the saying an eye for an eye comes into effect? In most countries, the death penalty remains an often practiced option, while in the United States it differs from state to state. If you are willing to commit a crime knowing that the consequences can be serious depending on the charge, and I believe that regardless of race, poverty or wealth, you should pay for the consequences. If you don't care enough to hurt others. Why should society care about the condemned when it comes to the death penalty? Most of the time, money is a big factor in which path the government or the prisoner should take. Capital punishment should be legalized in every state today, capital punishment is the issue that divides the nation. Many supporters believe in this “capital punishment,” but there are also many people who oppose it. In my opinion, I believe that capital punishment should be applied to capital murder. After months of deliberations, the committee concluded; this term kills. Some will say that this punishment fits the crime. Others believe that capital punishment is reckless, cruel and unjust and should be abolished. Capital punishment has existed in the United States since the earliest days. It was used to punish criminals by hanging or death by electric shock passing through the body, a method still used today as a method of electrocution. The death penalty can be carried out in five different ways, such as lethal injection, death by electricity, lethal gas, firing squad and hanging. But now we have the death penalty for crimes such as treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, or attempted murder of a witness, juror, or public official justice in certain cases. If the death penalty were abolished, executions would not be necessary because people convicted of these crimes would not be executed. But what would happen if these people were released on parole after committing such hate crimes? If you are ready to commit a crime even ifyou know the consequences can be serious depending on the charge, and I think no matter race, poverty or wealth, you should pay for the consequences. If you don't care enough to hurt others. Why should society care about the condemned when it comes to the death penalty? This is why I strongly believe that the death penalty is necessary for certain horrible crimes. Imposing a law such as the death penalty may benefit the government by not spending more money per inmate on food, health care, and other resources necessary for inmates serving prison terms to survive in prison. life imprisonment. The death penalty can also be used to help reduce the rates of crime committed in each state or country. This can prevent the inmate from committing the same crime after being released on a lesser charge or from committing another crime much worse than the first time, which can influence others around him, who may be non-violent, and highlight danger to other members of society. . The more we can prevent a criminal from committing a crime, the more likely we are that prisons will become overcrowded. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, the average cost of a non-capital case is $740,000. For cases in which the death penalty is sought by prosecutors, the average case cost is 1.26 million euros. In addition to court costs, the cost of housing a death row inmate is on average $90,000 more per year than that of a prisoner in the general population. However, according to the information provided to us, if we have two cases without capital sentences which each cost $740,000 for an inmate who committed a crime other than rape, kidnapping or murder; this now puts the government at $1,480,000 for just two cases. We currently have thousands of prisoners serving time and this number is increasing every year. So the amount that it now costs the government has become billions, but the expense has become an issue for this one case which can cost the state $1.26 million to execute one person for murder, when we have already reached this amount with only two prisoners. serve his sentence. If we look at the amount it costs for one person, $1.26 million, it seems insane, I would agree, but since when do we put a price on justice for our people? I think the cost of a death penalty case should be ignored when it comes to extreme crime. I've included an image below, which reveals how much over budget non-capital prison spending was in 2010. Would you agree that imposing a law such as the death penalty could benefit the government by not spending more money per inmate on food. , health care and other resources necessary for survival in prison for inmates serving life sentences. The death penalty can also be used to help reduce the rates of crime committed in each state or country. This can prevent the inmate from committing the same crime after being released on a lesser charge or from committing another crime much worse than the first time, which can influence others around him, who may be non-violent, and can put endangering other members of society. . In other words, the number of people sentenced to death is not excessively high as it was in the beginning, when capital punishment became an option for prisoners, and it has declined significantly over the years. The more we can stop a criminalto commit a crime, the more likely we are that prisons will not become overcrowded. In the United States, more than 2.3 million people are detained in state and federal prisons, local jails, Indian Country prisons, juvenile correctional facilities, immigration detention centers, military prisons and civil detention centers. Around 443,000 people have not been convicted of anything and are awaiting trial. Another 41,000 are detained without conviction in immigration centers. In contrast, 704,000 prisoners are classified as violent offenders in state prisons. Capital punishment laws create space for possible rehabilitation without addressing issues of prison overcrowding. Overcrowding can also become costly, starting with employees, food, benefits, health care, supplies and prison programs. When prisons become overcrowded, costs to taxpayers increase and can provoke public anger. Taxpayers who now spend billions of dollars to keep them funded will experience a significant increase due to overpopulation. Prisons that become overcrowded can significantly reduce living space. Overcrowded prisons sometimes lead to more crimes and deaths. It becomes more difficult to keep inmates when there is overcrowding. Overcrowding has been shown to increase the level of violence in prisons, as well as the prevalence of psychiatric depression and suicide. Of course, proponents of mental health prisons claim that they will focus on treatment, but the sad reality is that with subsequent budget cuts for treatment, most prisoners in mental health prisons will ultimately be locked up in cells with little else to do but take prescription drugs. medication and attending certain groups. Imagine that you are alone in a cell that measures no more than 6 feet by 8 feet; you were forced to be alone or vice versa. You lack privacy because you now share this cell with another inmate and a correctional officer walks by your cell every 2-4 hours to ensure the accuracy and security of a prison. You also have very little, if any, communication with family and friends and no access to social media to keep up with company news. Do you feel isolated now? What I mean here is that even if the convict is given a life sentence, as opposed to the death penalty, it will drive him crazy and create space for mental problems. In other words, prisoners begin to experience this emotional roller coaster with only their thoughts, books to read, limited activities that may not interest them, and perhaps even writing to keep them occupied throughout. of the day. How much of this repetitive cycle can you get through a day without starting to become a wreck yourself? Peace of mind is priceless, but not having enough access to health services in prisons for those with mental problems, while being incarcerated can increase the risks for the life of other prisoners, as well as suicide. the case of Warren McClesky, who was allegedly convicted of murdering an Atlanta police officer. Many suspected that the affair unfolded this way because of McCleskey's race. In McCleskey's final statement, he said: "I pray that one day this country, so-called a civilized society, will abolish this barbaric act." » (Lee) I know you worry as much as I do about whether a personinnocent will be blamed unethically. for a crime they did not commit. Innocence is a form of purity and good people should not be penalized for a crime committed by someone else, I agree. We are simply trying to reduce violence in the United States and punish those who abuse their right to life. “Since 1973, more than 160 people have been released from death row with proof of their innocence. From 1973 to 1999, there were an average of three exemptions per year. From 2000 to 2011, there were an average of five exemptions per year. Therefore, when we look at the innocent people who we believe are being executed for something they didn't do. The justice system works just as hard to save the innocent and ensure that the courts have enough evidence so as not to release someone who poses a threat to the community. My argument would be that very few people who are executed are found innocent after being found guilty. There is no real evidence that anyone put to death was innocent. I think there is a fine line at which the death penalty should be applied. If a serial killer or someone who committed a cruel homicide should be put to death, then I believe justice has been done. Let me give you a different perspective and say in this case, rather than the convict being sentenced to death, the person who committed the crime is punished with the life sentence, regardless of whether it is a felony charge. murder, rape or kidnapping. Some people remain dangerous, even behind bars. They continue to be a threat and harm to the rest of society while in prison. For example, Pablo Escobar. While Pablo Escobar was incarcerated, he still committed crimes from the luxurious prison he built. When this surfaced, authorities were prompted to send him to a more conventional prison on July 22, 1992. Everyone has the right to live; the only just punishment is to take away their right to make a living from murder. The past plays a big role when it comes to the death penalty. People will wonder what good this will do. If you look at previous cases, it has worked very well for people who are no longer there. Both men and women were vicious and had no remorse for a victim's well-being. There are two types of extremist people on death row. There is the extreme where they feel nothing. They have no concern or remorse for what they did to the person or their loved ones. Then there is the other extreme where they were emotionally involved and very intimate with their victims. These kinds of people deserve to die and we must kill them. The criminal is arrested, tried and sentenced. It is understood the sentence will be served, but the victim he killed has no role to play in his case. He cannot speak for himself because he is no longer with us. The killer deprived his family, friends and loved ones of his presence. Watching him grow and prosper. Their grief began with the murder itself. It probably won't end with the murder being carried out, but it provides a sense of relief to the family that the murder no longer lives because the victim no longer lives either. Can we do without the death penalty? I think we can do without murder maniacs and rapists who commit cold-blooded murder. The death penalty was instituted for a certain percentage of individuals who do not deserve to be part of society or even to continue living. The death penalty is not only imposed on anyone who commits theft or fraud. It's a life for a life. If these people cared about their own lives, they would not take the lives of others. Keep in mind, 31(1), 124-134.