When reading, the main focus of the article “Faces of War” by Caroline Alexander focuses on the devastating events that the Great War. We see that as the world entered the 20th century, we also entered a new type of era of war. As technology increased dramatically, many countries had evolved to new forms of weapons and new combat tactics. These technological advances have allowed many already developed countries to be more ineffective in combat. Such battles have led to much chaos and destruction in the world. But what stands out after the war is how traumatized the soldiers were by their experience and their overall view of themselves. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The question the author answers is how, among all the terrible post-war life experiences the soldiers had to endure, Alexander focuses on how the soldiers had to live with masks special ones to cover the flat wounds on their faces from the war. And as I read this article, I came to feel truly sorry for the soldiers who had to go to war and come back alive only to suffer more because of the injuries they suffered. But as technology improved firearms, it also improved medicine, allowing surgeons to provide plastic surgery services and give soldiers with serious facial injuries a new face meant to match the identical to their original face. And among those surgeons who stood out to me was Sir Harold Gillies because of the way he stood out in the way he contributed to the development of a process such as plastic surgery for men who are came with war-wounded faces. Gillies was very interested in his work to the extent that he wanted men to look at each other again as usual. Gillies went on to state that “men without noses are very beautiful, like ancient marbles” (Alexander). And what I noticed was that Gillies thought that soldiers affected by such tragedy were considered unique in some way because they looked like ancient marbles. I feel like this had a positive impact on the soldiers, as they were already suffering from being traumatized by the war. The most critical information in this article is how the technique of making masks for soldiers was improving, as more soldiers would need to use masks. a mask. And this is where I feel like Francis Derwent Wood; a sculptor played a major role in contributing his ideas and establishing his perspective on the conflict of the situation. As a sculptor and with the skills he possessed, he helped sculpt and gave ideas to surgeons that would also make the process easier. He also established a mask manufacturing unit which was recognized by an article titled The Lancet. But we see that the central assumptions underlying the author's thinking were how such an expansion of the process of helping wounded soldiers become themselves again developed. And it was important that these men looked like each other again. And the main reason Alexander mentions this is because the people who received such treatment in some way berated themselves to the point of feeling hideous in the eyes of others. Alexander says: "The psychological effect on a man who has to go through life, a.