Table of ContentsThe Argument for Why Euthanasia Should Be LegalA Real-Life Example in Which Euthanasia Was DeniedConclusionVoluntary Euthanasia or Suicide assisted living has been a global debate for many years. One of the main questions asked in this essay is why should euthanasia be legal? Should we or should we not have limits to our personal autonomy? Personal autonomy refers to the right and ability to be in control of one's own body and choices, without manipulation or external influence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayThe Argument for Why Euthanasia Should Be LegalIn general, those who protest lethal injections believe that denying such a right is a violation of human rights. , and people should have the opportunity to die with dignity and end intense pain. The opposing argument is more complex. There are a number of different views according to which committing suicide prematurely is considered wrong. For example, religious views that life is a gift from God, consideration of a doctor's oath to do no harm, as well as the risk of people who did not really want to die being killed. There are a number of different opinions. theories and ethical principles surrounding this debate, both for and against the legalization of euthanasia. The first theory that opposes euthanasia is that of the sanctity of life. It implies the idea that life should be respected and appreciated as the most precious thing on Earth. This theory goes hand in hand with the religious view that life is a gift from God and that we cannot end a life on our own terms. The principle of Ahimsa is a Buddhist prohibition against euthanasia, which is fundamentally a primordial belief to “do no harm.” This theory is linked to the healing role of the doctor, because in the original Hippocratic Oath, doctors swore to "do no harm." Expecting doctors to administer a lethal injection goes completely against this oath, and many believe it is unreasonable to make doctors agents of death. This disrupts patient-doctor trust and can be traumatic for the doctor with the responsibility of deliberately ending another person's life, even if it was consensual. On the contrary, the aforementioned right to autonomy is a strongly argued point for both sides of euthanasia. debate. Most people live with the desire to take control of themselves, whether in decisions such as their career, their love life, or even their personal medical treatment. The illegality of assisted suicide is seen as a limit to personal autonomy. However, it can be argued that personal autonomy is and should remain limited; people can't do everything they want. People can't take other people's things, people can't kill other people, etc. and this makes the world safer and can overall be seen as a positive thing. In favor of legalization, the principle of mercy refers to the concept of ending everyone's life. pain and suffering, which favors the use of lethal injection in extreme cases where the patient in question suffers agony that cannot be remedied in any other way. Similarly, the value of Death with Dignity dislikes the idea of ​​a person spending their final days in immeasurable and/or connected pain..