In this source, Aziz discusses the potential outcomes of genetic engineering. He begins this source by suggesting that genetic modification can lead to the creation of humans similar to video game characters: enhanced and indestructible. This thought seems ideal, but it could also cause a host of conflicts. Some of these flaws include the superiority of the rich and the higher probability of success in engineered humans. This source is useful for my article because its information supports the idea that genetic engineering is unethical and can create several conflicts within society. This source is not as detailed as some of my other sources, but still contains unique and important information that can support my argument. This source is reliable and unbiased. Aziz uses many examples, from Usain Bolt to Selena Gomez, to prove his point, which is quite effective. I intend to use this article to support the idea that genetic modification can create a superior human race, which will result in several inequalities within society. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay This source poses several questions that society should consider before deciding to genetically modify the human race. Some of the questions asked in this article suggest that genetic engineering can change our society in negative ways and lead to genetic consequences. Of all my internet sources, this is one of the most beneficial to my argument. This source addresses many of the issues under debate about genetic engineering. This source is not trying to cover up facts to support one side of the argument; it discusses both the positive and negative aspects of genetic modification, although the author's personal opinion is clear. This source can be useful for both my argument that genetic engineering harms society and could possibly be my counterargument due to presenting the positive and negative aspects of human modifications. Of all my sources, this is by far the most useful. In this text, several different authors offer their views on genetic modification and the ethical nature of this idea. He also discusses how the process should be regulated and even covers human cloning. Overall, the book is reliable and unbiased, which fits my argument perfectly. The aim of this source is to cover all opposing viewpoints in genetic engineering. Because it covers all perspectives of each argument, this makes it an ideal source for developing my own argument. This source will be ideal for any arguments I plan to make in my essay, including my counterargument. I will be able to compare the different points of view closely, which will strengthen my argument. As the title of this Ted Talk suggests, Knoepfler discusses the ethical problems that CRISPR can cause. He begins his talk by creating a basic understanding of CRISPR, then expands on the problems it can cause. Some of the issues he discusses are how genetic modification can create inequality in society and that humans should not try to change things as crucial as genes. This talk is incredibly detailed and informative. The goal of this source is to help understand what CRISPR actually is and then expand on the outcomes it can cause. It mainly focuses on the negative aspects of genetic engineering, but I wouldn't consider it as..