blog




  • Essay / The question of the possibility of time travel

    The question of time travel is not new because it has interested people for centuries and continues to interest us today. However, despite the great concern and eagerness of people to discover the mysteries of time, it still keeps its secrets like centuries ago. Even in our time, where enormous scientific and technological advances have been made, it seems that we have only managed to scratch the surface of this question and to something "floating just above the surface." Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayTime travel can be thought of as traveling through time in a way that parallels movement in space, such as sending something back in time or peeking into the future, without the experience of the intervening duration. In such a case, a time machine can be considered a mechanism used to travel through time, regardless of hypothetical or fictional issues. Currently, it is revealed that while the laws that govern physics consent to time travel, even though this notion has been widely used in fiction, one-way travel is likely via the perceptible fact of time dilation which is speed based in the common theory of relativity. The question that arises regarding this question is whether time travel is possible, practically or hypothetically. This is why, if it proves feasible by circumventing the paradoxes, this possibility should be taken into account. Also taken into account, the possibilities of imbalances are caused by the time traveler. Through the calculations and principles stated, the big picture is that paradoxes cannot be created by simple masses moving through the wormholes of time. When time travel is introduced, the preconditions leading to paradoxes are left aside. Looking at the results of the calculations generally, none of the imaginary paradoxes created by time travel myths can physically begin at a specific point. Some incidences appear to generate machines to facilitate communication or travel. The speed of time travel is much faster than the speed of light. Some explanations infer that there is an instantaneous exchange of information between elements to maintain the association between particles. This process was described as "spooky action at a distance" by Einstein and examined in his research as mentioned in Gott's Time travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Traveling Through Time (2002). Regardless, modern theories do. not dealing with the idea of ​​time travel or faster-than-light time communication, even though the causality retained in quantum mechanics is a careful consequence of new quantum-related theories. Exhibitions show that today some people have been visited by so-called "future humans" who may have very advanced technology facilitating time travel. But there has been a lack of response positive and very low participation in such events, because people have little patience for such affairs. Hypothetically, without the time machine, time travel is impossible, which is why returning to the time before the invention. of the machine would be inaccessible. It is therefore necessary to invent a machine which would allow them to travel in time with fewer limiting factors. A number of experiments have been carried out to contribute to the idea of ​​results.inverted which are interpreted differently by scientists. The first experiment to examine is the delayed choice quantum eraser made by Marlan Scully. In this test, the interleaved photons are split into "idle" and "signal" photons, with the signal photons appearing from one of the two points, thus their locations are calculated. The experimenter is able to either determine the source of the signal photons between the two locations or erase the information. Assuming that signal photons are preferred over free photons, they are measured first. There is still an alternative which "may seem to retroactively guarantee whether an intrusive model is well thought out or not in the duration of correlation of the amplitude of the useless photons with that of the signal photons". For this reason, experimenters are not able to establish in advance which choice would be made considering only the signal photons. Another experiment was carried out by Guntz Nimtz and Alfons. They claim to have transferred photons at a speed faster than the speed of light, violating Einstein's theory of relativity. These physicists claim to have used quantum tunneling; a phenomenon when microwave photons are moved through the middle of a pair of prisms spaced one meter apart. Other physicists have disputed this phenomenon, saying that it cannot transfer information faster than the speed of light. In each specific case where faster-than-light situations were alleged, numerous analytical details proved that to acquire signals, some type of conventional communication would have to be used. One example is that non-communication theory generally verifies that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmit data faster than conventional signaling. A number of presumptions, most concerning unique and common relativity, propose that appropriate geometries of spacetime or precise types of spatial motion can allow time travel to the past or to the future if the geometries or the movements are feasible. In technological manuscripts, doctors normally use the common language of movement. Here, motion generally refers only to a change in spatial position as the time coordinate varies, and instead discusses the possibility of closed time curves, which are world lines that form closed loops in space- time, allowing objects to return to their own past. . Again, there is an explanation of the equations of space and time in the common theory of relativity. He says that space has curves similar to time, i.e. Gödel space-time, while the physical plausibility of the clarifications remains doubtful. On the other hand, relativity states that if one traveled away from Earth at relativistic speeds and returned, more time would have passed on Earth than for the traveler, so in this sense it is accepted that relativity allows for future travel. In the relativistic sense, there is no deliberate solution showing how much time actually passes between departures and returns, but there appears to be an objective explanation of the proper time experienced by the land and by the person traveling. For example, the age of the traveler and the Earth can clarify this issue. On the other hand, many scientists believe that time travel is very unlikely. Any hypothesis that would allow time travel requires resolving the difficulties of causality. A typical example of a causal setback is the “grandfather paradox.” As described in Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Scandalous Legacy by Thorne, the author.