Heated debates surrounding the issues plaguing the four corners of the world regularly ensue, and to this day, these issues are discussed at length. However, a hot topic that comes up most often and has not yet been resolved in time is that of illegal immigration, in particular that of crossing borders without a visa. Regarding the immigration crisis in the United States, which has given rise to tensions not only between political parties divided on this issue, but also between the United States and Mexico during the mandate of the Trump administration which sought to "build the wall" and Mexico initially financed this project itself, and now the Republican Party's rhetoric has shifted to forcing the Mexican government to reimburse them once it is completed finished. While some view the United States as having a moral obligation to allow illegal residents to remain in the United States, a movement rooted in xenophobia and hostility toward foreigners has garnered far more support from others citing constitutional precedence and immigration policy to expel these intruders from the country. because they constitute a threat to “internal tranquility”, in the words of the Constitution. Although no single political philosophy prevails and internal struggles for leverage to protect or expel these border crossers are only intensifying in the wake of the U.S. government shutdown, a system of ethics that might be helpful in resolving this issue and perhaps a bipartisan convergence of views on this issue is that of Kantian ethics. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Kant's most notable contribution to the field of ethics is the categorical imperative, his focus during his study of ethics. Described as a supreme moral commandment from which a subset of moral laws is derived, a categorical imperative is most often stated as follows: "act in a way that treats humanity, whether in your own person or in another, always as an end, and never as a single end. a way. » (The Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica) Succinctly, he argues that people should treat themselves and each other as "ends in themselves", i.e. -say as rational actors, and not as “means to an end”, that is to say pawns in their endgame. It is from this concept that Kantian ethics flows freely from this position of deontology, the idea that morality should be centered on duty rather than on emotions or, as mentioned previously, as an end. Kant uses a series of thought experiments to demonstrate that his system of ethics relies on the fulfillment of these moral duties, which he believes validates his ideas. It uses traditionally religious commandments such as thou shalt not kill or thou shalt not steal and goes further to say that these commandments are universal, even in circumstances that would require them to be suspended for the safety or benefit of the person(s). people who might be injured in the process. Criticism of this extremism of the categorical imperative has been recorded, nevertheless the idea that people should be treated as equals in terms of moral standing, and not classified as users and used in the grand scheme of things, is relevant to the case of whether these illegal immigrants should be treated as human beings seeking to maximize their own happiness by committing crimesnon-violent, or should their crimes define their actions and deserve to be kicked out of the country they have called home for many years. The U.S. government, led by the Republican Party, which has a majority in both houses of Congress, has consistently pushed its agenda for stricter immigration and stronger patrols on the U.S.-Mexico border to prevent this uncontrolled and illegal influx. of Mexicans. Since the presidential election of Donald Trump in 2016, the Republican Party's program has been more stimulated than ever and gaining momentum. On the other side of the aisle, the Democratic Party's liberal values ​​are more consistent with Kant's ethical precepts and oppose the Republican Party in its attempt to uproot entire families and communities in its policymaking efforts. and attempts at every turn to stop them from enacting these morally questionable beliefs into law. The current erratic political climate is largely due to Trump's attacks on his own Justice Department, the media, and citizens exercising their First Amendment rights. According to a New York Times article, ICE, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, poses a serious threat to immigrants' rights: "Ravi's arrest is the latest in a series that shows clearly that ICE targets immigrant activists and leaders for security reasons. detention and expulsion. (Gottlieb) The Trump White House is far removed from the realities of the lives of these individuals and their families and how their positions on this issue and legislation affect a significant minority of the population. This disconnect is a reflection on the social hierarchy of the United States, in which one percent of Anglo-Saxon Protestants, often white, wield enormous power that they then use to influence the lower ends of the socioeconomic spectrum in the direction that they wish. Contrary to Kantianism, Trump and his officials have used their position of power in such a way that they have pitted those at the bottom of the proverbial barrel against each other, as a means to an end by which they protect their power of the majority. . It is the hope that the categorical imperative could be the final blow to Trump's politicism. Immanuel Kant, a product of the European Enlightenment and champion of liberal ideals, would undoubtedly disapprove of Trump's manipulation of Republican values, as well as society and its problems, for his personal gain, going against his stated belief in the treating all as agents in their own right rather than as puppets. Kant's formulations of the categorical imperative all formulate the same basic idea in logical steps. His first formulation was to act according to a maxim such that it could become a universal law. In other words, it is a moral obligation that absolutely should be offered. Is there not a moral obligation to act in accordance with the Golden Rule, that is, to treat others as we ourselves wish to be treated, as well as an absolute necessity to adapt this idea to the current migration crisis? Kant would argue that these illegal immigrants are people, just like us, and rational actors. Relocating and forcibly reinstalling them would strip them of their status as ends in themselves capable of autonomous action and would be seen as a means to achieve the desired goal of enforcing environmental control. racist immigration that discriminates against Mexicans. legacy of the rest of the population. In the same vein, "Kant also argued that general obedience to the categorical imperative.