blog




  • Essay / The Ethics of Animal Testing: Ending Cruelty and Seeking Alternatives

    Imagine being forced into a small cage with almost no space to move, isolated from your family, and forced to endure procedures which will most likely cost you your life. This doesn't sound like your ideal situation, does it? Well, that's what millions of animals are subjected to in animal testing every year. Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test in which a living animal is forced to undergo an activity likely to cause pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that humans suffer from, such as major types of heart disease, Parkinson's disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, humans artificially integrate the signs of these diseases into laboratory animals to mimic human disease. In this argumentative essay, I will reflect on animal testing and whether it is right to allow innocent animals to suffer because of us. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay I don't think so, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are typically subjected to force-feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, and, in many cases, confinement. to death. Animals don't deserve this, they are living beings like us. Many people can argue that animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, such as insulin and the polio vaccine, but there are now alternative testing methods that can replace the demand for animals , such as glass tests. Furthermore, there is no evidence that animal testing has been essential to achieving major medical advances, and if enough money and resources were devoted to animal-free alternatives, other solutions would be found. If we spend just a little of our time protesting this injustice, millions of lives could be saved. Additionally, drugs that pass animal testing are not necessarily safe. The 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with serious malformations, was tested on animals before it was commercially advertised. So not only were animals lost, but thousands of children were also permanently affected. “Promising” treatments in animals rarely work in humans. Not only are animals' time, money and lives wasted with a tremendous amount of suffering, but effective remedies are wrongly rejected and dangerous treatments are introduced into society because some chemicals are unproductive or harmful to animals prove useful. when used by humans. Aspirin, for example, is fatal for certain animal species while humans benefit greatly from it. Is it worth animals to suffer so much for inaccurate results, which will likely cause more harm than benefit? Many people also believe that there is nothing wrong with testing on animals because animal research is highly controlled and laws are in place to protect animals from mistreatment. , yet, according to research, 95% of animals used in tests are not protected by animal protection law. The animal protection law does not..