The term solidarity according to Merriam-Webster (nd) characterizes the unity of a group or class which produces or is based on a community of interests, objectives and standards. The term and ideas were introduced by French sociologist Emile Durkheim in 1893. According to Durkheim, types of social solidarity are related to types of society, which are mechanical and natural social orders. Mechanical solidarity basically reflects how individuals are associated through comparable work, instructive and strict way of life. Natural solidarity mainly shows the association that emerges from the specialization of work and integrants between groups of people that occurs due to modernization and mechanical social orders. Although individuals perform various errands with different qualities and interests, the demand and its solidarity rely on each other to work in their own particular endeavors. At the moment, breeders produce vegetables for cultivation in the region and the area specializes in individual creation of advanced devices for cultivation. This essay will essentially present a brief presentation of mechanical solidarity and natural solidarity, it will integrate the contrasts between these two types of solidarity, the qualities of this solidarity and its effect on the person. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Mechanical solidarity occurs within small colonies of small groups of family relationships where conventional qualities and social morals are shifted from one age to another. age. Mechanical solidarity is a sort of pre-industrial social order where similarities of distinction appear in terms of conduct, beliefs, dialects and norms. There is no specialization or separation of abilities between groups living in a similar region. Each part feels associated with the life of the group in a way like that of the different individuals, since each has an encounter with the world which comes from a strictly based normal culture, which repeats in each individual perspectives, feelings and similar actions. With the word Mechanics, Durkheim is not emphasizing the machine, he is simply implying that people's lifestyles are the same and that individuals' experiences and thoughts contrast less. Individuals accept because they have a place among individuals from a similar family. Over time, these less challenging social orders disappear, urban regions expand, and complex divisions of capabilities emerge within urban communities, between organizations, and within national states. Natural solidarity is found in social orders where there is a complex division of labor and a wide variety of perspectives, feelings, and actions. No family unit, neighborhood, city, or economy can provide its individuals with everything they need to endure. Economies depend on family as well as educational institutions to produce reliable workers with the required skill set. There is an extraordinary variety of professions, racial and ethnic backgrounds, strict beliefs, and political perspectives. This diversity of individuals, gatherings, and organizations is categorized into unmistakable but related jobs and abilities. Organic solidarity is similar to industrial society. These societies are heterogeneous in terms of behavior, beliefs, languages ​​and principles. Organic solidarity arises from the dependence that emerges from the specialization of work and correspondencebetween human groups, a progress that occurs in modern and industrial societies. It is a social attachment that depends on the trust people have in each other in more developed social orders. Despite the fact that people perform very different tasks and regularly have different values ​​and interests, the very order and solidarity of society relies on their dependence on each other to accomplish their predefined tasks. Thus, social solidarity is maintained in increasingly complex social orders, for example thanks to the interdependence of its segments; farmers produce food to take care of the factory workers who produce the farm equipment that farmers need to produce food. Organic solidarity is found in societies where there is a complex division of labor and a wide variety of methods of critical analysis, feeling, and action. No family, neighborhood, city or economy can produce everything its individuals need to survive. Savings depend not only on family but also on instructive intuitions to create reliable workers with the required skill set. There is an extraordinary variety of professions, racial and ethnic backgrounds, religious beliefs, and political perspectives. Such a variety of individuals, groups and institutions consists of particular but interdependent roles and functions. I understood that societies with undifferentiated work, by which I mean primitive societies, demonstrated mechanical solidarity whereas, in contrast to these societies with undifferentiated work, I mean primitive societies demonstrated mechanical solidarity while in contrast to these societies at work a high division of labor, or expanded specialization which implies that modern societies demonstrated organic solidarity. The division of labor made workers more alien to each other, but gradually dependent on each other. Since specialization implied that no individual worker would make an item on their own. In mechanical solidarity, attachment and social adhesion arise from the homogeneity of people, which means that individuals feel associated through comparable work, preparation and an instructive and rigorous way of life, which are based regularly on the connecting links of family systems. Mechanical solidarity functions fundamentally in “traditional” and small-scale societies. Moving to organic solidarity is a cohesion that depends on the trust people have in each other in more developed social orders. It arises from the relationship that arises from the specialization of work and the complementarities between individuals. As Durkheim said, the laws of a society are the most visible image of social solidarity and the association of public activity in its generally exact and stable structure. The legal system controls all components of society with the aim of making them cooperate adequately. The type of laws; repressive and restitutive law is comparable to the type of social solidarity. First, repressive law is identified at the center of normal consciousness and everyone has an interest in judging and punishing the guilty. Furthermore, restitutive law focuses on the victim in cases of wrongdoing since there is no generally shared belief as to what harms society. Restitutive law concerns the organic state of a society and is made conceivable by progressively specific groups in society, for example, courts and legal advisors. Whatever.