Table of contentsIntroductionObservation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomenaFormulation of one or more hypotheses to explain the phenomenonUse of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to quantitatively predict the results of new observationsPerforming prediction tests by several independent experimentersConclusionIntroductionThe scientific method is the method used by scientists as an investigation technique. This is used by many researchers to study natural and physical phenomena in the world we live in. When the scientist is creating a theory, human errors will corrupt the final results. This error is due to the establishment of human personal and cultural beliefs which will interfere with the final interpretations of the hypothesis posed, to correct the errors of the developed theory; Scientific method procedures are developed with the integration of decisive factors and standard procedures. The person certified to apply scientific methods in forensic science is known as a forensic pathologist. A forensic pathologist is highly skilled and knows how to apply scientific methods to arrive at professional, flawless conclusions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay A scientific reviewer helps reduce the human aspects of bias and prejudice when reviewing defined theories and hypotheses. For many years, the scientific method was not used in forensic science because it was argued that forensic science dealt with past events and that past events possessed qualities that scientific methods and their procedures do not. couldn't manage. The qualities of these recent events are that past events cannot be observed due to their executed nature. Past events cannot be predicted or inferred from physical evidence and cannot be subjected to scientific experiments. However, after careful consideration and slight modifications, scientific methods are now used in forensic science and integrated into the science of criminal investigation (Becker, 2009).Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomenaThe first step The scientific method is the observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. The forensic pathologist begins by analyzing the crime scene and observing all the evidence left at the crime scene. If this is a murder investigation, the first step would be to investigate the cause of death and determine where the shooting took place and where the victim was killed. If the crime involved a weapon or dangerous object, the medical examiner will ask officers to try to locate the location of the weapon. Further observations of phenomena evident at the crime scene could help present a strong case in court. These observations are crucial because they could help determine whether suspects should be charged or indicted. It is the legal system that deals with evidence and evidence, not mere theories (Miller, 2003). Forensic scientists must present evidence to the courts of what they have discovered; some forensic scientists are called to testify in court to identify what they observe during the investigation. The pathologist will provide images, charts and written reports to the courts. Formulation of one or more hypotheses to explain the phenomena. The second step of the scientific method in forensic medicine is the formulation of one orseveral logical hypotheses to explain the phenomena (Science Buddies, 2010). The forensic pathologist must formulate a logical and reasonable hypothesis that could explain the phenomenon. This is done by formulating valid questions that would highlight or indicate the current situation. The forensic pathologist could also formulate a theory that could provide possible explanations for what happened at the crime scene. Potential theories in a gun case would be to have a theory about what type of weapon could have fired the bullet found at the crime scene, the possible location of the actual crime scene if the body of the victim had been moved. The observation stage and the construction of a hypothesis form a complex cause and effect relationship, with the observation being the effect and the hypothesis and/or theory being the most likely cause of the effect. If the victim was murdered, they must find all the theories about where the victim was shot, their theory must conform to the same theory as the detectives. If the detective's theory does not match the forensic scientist's theory, the evidence must be able to prove his theory. Using the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena or to quantitatively predict the results of new observations. the forensic scientist would track the use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to quantitatively predict the results of new observations (Science Buddies, 2010). The forensic pathologist's task is to conduct a study of the background information regarding the given case. Of course, there must be one or more searches similar or related to the case in question. The forensic pathologist's task is to conduct a literature review of previous research that other scientists have conducted in the past that was related to this particular case. It is not wise to start any research from scratch as this would result in a considerable waste of time. This involves the investigation and justification of facts that had already been dealt with before. Humans have a pattern when researching human activities. Research into another related case could provide valuable insight into the case. Drug cases can have many similarities, but the detective and medical examiner must have the hypothesis that the victim is a drug dealer or was a bystander. The victim's criminal record will allow the medical examiner and detective to know if this case was drug-related. If they determined it was drug-related, they should look into whether the victim had rival gangs or enemies. Carrying out tests of predictions by several independent experimenters The next step that the forensic scientist would follow would be to carry out experimental tests of predictions by several independent experimenters (Science Buddies, 2010). This step tends to justify or testify to the theory(s) put forward. The results of the experiments could end up approving or disapproving. This phenomenon highlights the need to set up several distinct and independent experimenters. This is to prevent experts’ biases and biases from being reflected in the results. If the forensic expert who formulated the hypothesis and possible theories were to conduct the experiments alone, then he would tend to prove the established hypotheses and theories rather than disapprove of them. A control group should be created to compare or contrast with the results obtained in the experiments. This would help verify that the results of the experiments are true and without bias. Forensic science involves the application of scientific methodology in the legal field. Forensic medicine.