Solution #1: Input, Flow, and Output: The first recommendation I offer concerns HR 3610; Pub L. 104-208; 110 statistics. 3009-546, which went into effect to ensure that the border was protected from illegal aliens coming to America and also made applications for illegal aliens even stricter than before (Stevens). The inputs for this recommendation are utility costs for computers and Internet access, travel expenses, additional training, and office supplies. The results are assessments and selection exams. The result includes decreasing the number of illegal aliens deported and providing benefits by increasing the application process at the federal level. Best type of cost-benefit analysis: (Explain why your selection is the best/why others are not as useful) For this recommendation, the contribution would be measured in dollars and the outcome is measured in utility or level of achievement . It would be more effective to use cost-utility analysis to calculate the effectiveness of incentives granted to certain illegal aliens. The input would be measured in dollars and the outcome is measured in points awarded to compare illegal and legal immigrants using the incentives and those still in the United States thanks to the amnesty. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) would not be used due to the dollar cost, which is required for both inputs and outputs and there is no dollar amount for outputs. The fixed utility cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) method would not be used because this recommendation would actually result in an increase rather than a decrease, while serving the same population. The fixed budget method (CEA) would not be effective because the population served remains the same....... middle of document...... cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) would not be used because it the recommendation would actually result in an increase rather than a decrease, while still serving the same population. The fixed budget method (CEA) would not be effective because the population served remains the same. Best type of outcome measurement: (Explain why your selection is best/why others are not as useful) The quasi-experimental method is the best outcome evaluation design. for this recommendation because the data can be compared before and after the change in the increase in the duration of work visas. Since these groups are not randomly assigned, but rather are ordered forward and backward, it would be more efficient to use a quasi-experimental design rather than an experimental one. Since pre-experiments are used in the case of using only one group, they will not be effective..