-
Essay / The ruling rulers of Syria - 710
vThe desire to rule a country, create a powerful kingdom that could function longer and make names in history is the wish of almost all humans. Lives, money, and many other valuable things were used to save kingdoms. An example of kingdom governance is that of Syria. The Asad family has ruled the kingdom for decades, even four decades. The king rules a state of law, modified by him for himself and his powerful allies. Now that the Syrians had suffered much of the brutality and suffering of the king's rule, they finally decided to oppose the king and force him from the throne. The Syrian opposition trying to establish an Islamic rule of law in the country, in contrast to the Shiite coalition government led by the Assad administration. The main factor that causes violence to increase in Syria is that the opposition is trying to establish an Islamic government in the country, whose sovereignty belongs to Allah Almighty, and the rules and regulations of the life of an individual are based on those of the rules of the Quran and the Sunnah. Sharia is the code of life and Islam the religion, unlike the current government whose constitution, laws and articles are codified and modified by those of Shiite scholars based on the teachings and preachings of the Shiite religion, which is an incomplete, incompetent and incompatible model of life. The Syrian, who suffered greatly from the Shiite government, therefore felt an urgent need for a change of government and therefore headed towards a historic demonstration which is still continuing. The distant cries and cries of Syrians still echo in the streets from the war that struck Syria against the Assad kingdom, but the greed and lust for power and the ego of...... middle of paper ...... also have their personal benefit in the country. The investigation indicates that Russia is economically involved in the Syrian conflict. Russia has its own economic interests. The war continues. The rule of law of democracy in Syria is that of liberal democracy. The Assad administration and its allies are outspoken supporters of liberal democracy, which stands in stark contrast to the needs and desires of the opposition party. Liberal democracy believes in complete freedom and individual rights, while in conservative democracy, the rule of law is a priority. For example, in Afghanistan, the rule of law model is that of a conservative democracy, in which the constitution is codified by applying Sharia law. In this constitution, no law opposes the principles of Sharia, for example the strict prohibition of alcohol, the prohibition of homosexuality and the death penalty..