Table of ContentsIntroductionFree School MealsOpposition and RebuttalConclusionWorks CitedIntroductionChildren are delicate and it is important to provide them with the necessary support they need at school, including access to a free lunch. The question of whether school meals should be free or not is a long-standing debate with no clear consensus. Supporters argue that children benefit greatly from free lunch programs, while critics say providing free food is not a school's responsibility. This essay will argue that school children should receive free lunches because of the negative impact of hunger on learning and the long-term consequences of food insecurity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'?Get the original essayFree School MealsResearch has shown a strong correlation between free school meals and improved academic performance. Schwartz and Rothbart found that students who benefited from such programs had better grades [1]. Hungry children have difficulty concentrating in class, leading to poor test results. Proper nutrition is essential for optimal brain function, which highlights the importance of providing free lunches to those who need them. Poor nutrition can hinder children's cognitive development, making it difficult to concentrate in class. Therefore, the lack of free meals in schools contributes to poor performance, lack of concentration and poor general health, which can lead to high dropout rates and limited opportunities for these children later. in life. The majority of children who need free meals come from food. -unsafe housing. Faced with growing economic difficulties, more and more families living near or below the poverty line cannot afford to meet their basic needs. Denying free meals to these children puts them in a vulnerable position, as they may not have anything to eat when they return home. These children experience hunger both in and out of school, leading to a prolonged lack of essential nutrients and negative consequences on their health. Poverty is a significant factor that influences school dropout rates, and the lack of free meals further compounds this problem [2]. By providing free lunches, schools can help these children stay in school and help build a healthier society in the long term. Opposition and RebuttalOpponents argue that supporting free lunch programs is expensive and distracts from the primary purpose of schools, which is to teach. . However, these claims are weak and do not justify the elimination of such initiatives. The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) compensates schools for the cost of providing free lunch to students [3]. Schools receive reimbursements from the government, indicating that the expense argument is not true. Additionally, providing free lunch to students should be considered part of the school's responsibility to create a conducive learning environment. It would be futile to teach hungry children without addressing the underlying causes of their struggles. Therefore, schools have a moral obligation to provide free meals to students in need. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our editors. 1-53.