blog




  • Essay / Third Presidential Debate Review: Clinton Vs. Trump

    Additional Credit: Third Presidential Debate The presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was unforgettable and one hundred percent worth watching. Looking at the character of both throughout the debate, I believe neither of them should be held responsible for the government and the people. Having two presidential candidates talking crap about each other instead of addressing the important issues we deal with in society is almost absurd. Watching the debate multiple times made it easier for me to find logical fallacies and gave me a clear understanding of what I expected from our future president. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay That being said, President Donald Trump seemed to bring up more fallacies in his arguments and used them excessively. Immigration became a major topic during the debate against Hillary Clinton and the main issues Americans have with our president today. In the video, when Trump began talking about immigrants and immigration, he said: "Immigrants are drug dealers, rapists and are causing more crime in the United States today ". Many people may share this opinion, but what about those who think that they are benefiting today's society and making the world a better place today? Trump used a sweeping generalization based on his personal opinion. Building the wall seemed like a great idea that would make America a better place, and the “security” of Americans was well assured. He used it again when he said that “African-Americans and Hispanics are going through a hell that is horrible.” Personally, I am African American and my life is completely perfect. I don't wake up every day afraid and full of anger. Just because some minorities may be living in hell doesn't mean they all are. Another logical fallacy that President Trump was an expert at was changing terrain instead of answering the question and staying on topic during the debate. For example, Trump started to lose the debate on taxes, so he instead used to act ad hominem and change the subject to change the subject and focus on Hillary with the comments he made on ISIS. He was so determined to win the tax debate that the only recourse was to bring up unnecessary topics in the conversation. Even when asked why he would be a better candidate for creating jobs, Trump first started talking about his father's loan to start his business, which had nothing to do with the question. After the presidential election, I watched the debate one more time and Trump's statement about how politicians give Americans hope, then forget everything they said during the debate and just four years in power. Many politicians falsely promise that they will forget all this when they win the election. Americans relate very well to this issue, and he gave the impression that it affected him as well, which can be considered as a private citizen. Even though Donald Trump made some mistakes during the debate, that doesn't mean Americans shouldn't have hope in our new president. However, Hillary also used some major logical fallacies that could have benefited from her getting more popular votes during the election. . Personally, I think that simple people have been used enormously throughout the debate by.