Table of ContentsRhetorical Devices UsedTarget AudienceWorks CitedMathew Taibbi's article, “The $9 Billion Witness: Meet JPMorgan Chase's Worst Nightmare,” is a news article intriguing and informative about a white collar crime by Mathew Taibbi. It was published in RollingStone on November 6, 2014 and offers a third-person narration of how Alayne Fleishmann, a securities lawyer and former Chase bank employee, acted as a whistleblower in exposing the scandal of mega-corruption involving senior executives of the JP Morgan Chase bank. executive managers. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayThe author provides a detailed account of how white-collar crime was planned and orchestrated and how the Top government officials and institutions collaborated with the culprits to hide the information from the public. Fleishmann witnessed the crime being executed while working in the bank as a quality control manager and even wrote two letters to senior bank officials informing them of the dire consequences that would follow (Taibbi , 2014). She was ready to provide information as credible evidence to ensure that the culprits were brought to justice. However, the attorney general and the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) worked with Jamie Damion, the bank's CEO, to prevent Fleishmann from releasing information she had about the affair. Rhetorical devices such as situational irony and metaphor were used in the author's article to convey a particular message to the audience. Mathew targets the general public to inform them of the true story of the greatest white-collar crime in American history. The article uncovers numerous insider trading activities that occurred but were hidden from the public. This article aims to analyze different elements of Mathew Taibbi's press article. Rhetorical Devices UsedMathew used different rhetorical devices to convey a particular message and evoke emotions in the minds of the targeted audience. The irony of the situation is evident in the article, as evidenced by the decision of Attorney General Eric Holder, the judiciary, and the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) to help cover up the crime. These institutions were charged with ensuring that justice prevailed and overseeing the smooth running of activities, but they did the exact opposite, preventing Fleishmann from disclosing crucial evidence (Taibbi, 2014). The irony of the situation is also evident when the Chase bank board increased compensation. The package from a man who oversaw the largest regulatory fine ever paid by 74 percent at approximately $20 million (Taibbi, 2014). The author also used a simile in the article to compare financial products with soy in processed foods. He states: “Like soy in processed foods, these synthesized financial products are found in everything” (Taibbi). Another tool used in the article is a metaphor. The author compares the loans sold by Chase Bank to rotten dog meat to emphasize how bad they were. The author also uses rhetorical questions to emphasize a particular statement, as seen when he asks, "How bad were they?" » (Taibbi, 2014). Taibbi also used understatements in the article to emphasize how vague and fragile the ten and a half years were. The “statement of facts” page of the document issued by the.