Table of ContentsArguments for DSTArguments against DSTConclusionDaylight Saving Time (DST) has been a controversial topic for decades , with its supporters and opponents arguing over its advantages and disadvantages. While the practice of changing clocks twice a year aims to save energy and make better use of daylight, it has also been criticized for its negative effects on health, safety and productivity. In this essay, we will examine the arguments for and against DST, and explore the evidence and statistics that support both sides of the debate. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayArguments for Daylight Saving TimeProponents of DST often argue that it saves money energy by reducing the need for artificial lighting and heating in the evening. According to a report from the U.S. Department of Energy, extending daylight saving time by four weeks in 2007 saved about 0.5 percent of electricity per day. This may not seem significant, but multiplied over the entire country and over several months, the energy savings can be substantial. Additionally, proponents argue that DST encourages outdoor activities and reduces reliance on air conditioning during warmer months, further contributing to energy savings. Additionally, proponents say DST has economic benefits because it can increase consumer spending and boost the economy. Longer evening daylight hours provide more opportunities for people to shop, dine out, and participate in recreational activities, leading to increased sales for businesses. A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that extending DST by one month led to a 0.9% increase in consumer spending in the evening. This indicates that DST can have a positive impact on the economy by boosting consumer activity and increasing business revenue.Arguments Against DSTOn the other hand, opponents of DST DST argue that this practice has negative effects on public health and safety. . Studies have shown that disruption of the body's internal clock due to the time change can lead to trouble sleeping, increased fatigue, and a higher risk of heart attacks and strokes. A study published in the journal Current Biology found that the risk of heart attack increases by 24 percent on the Monday after the spring time change, when people lose an hour of sleep. This suggests that the biannual time change may have serious consequences for public health and well-being. Additionally, opponents of daylight saving time point to its potential negative impact on road safety. Research has shown that the Monday following the spring time change is associated with an increase in traffic accidents, as sleep-deprived drivers are more likely to be involved in collisions. A study by the University of Colorado Boulder found there was a 6% increase in fatal car crashes in the week following the spring time change, highlighting the potential dangers of being deprived of sleep caused by the sudden change of time. the productivity and efficiency gains associated with daylight saving time are minimal, if not negligible. A study conducted by the University of California, Santa Barbara found that energy savings from daylight saving time are offset by the increase in.