-
Essay / Conflicting Opinions on the Idea of Affirmative Action
Affirmative ActionAffirmative action is currently one of the most debated topics in this country due to the recent Supreme Court case Fisher v. University of Texas. People are against affirmative action because they believe it favors one group over another and allows quotas to be imposed in higher education and employment. Due to quotas, this leads to increased competition for a small number of places due to places reserved specifically for minority students in university admission and employment. We also see that with positive discrimination, qualified students are not admitted and less qualified students are admitted due to the quota system in universities and employment. It also allows students to be exposed to different cultures. People also support affirmative action because it allows for more competition, meaning that affirmative action equalizes the chances of minority students being eligible for difficult situations. I am for affirmative action because it allows for diversity in great institutions and in leadership positions in corporate America, but I am against when quotas are implemented in higher education and employment. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay America has a long history of inequality toward minority people. For the longest time, they have been treated as second-class citizens and discriminated against by society due to their access to limited opportunities when it comes to college admissions and job searches. President Lyndon B. Johnson's commencement address at Howard University, "To Fulfill These Rights," states that "in far too many ways, black Americans have been another nation: deprived of liberty, paralyzed by hatred , the doors of opportunity closed to hope.” In order to help society, everyone should be able to access the same type of freedom. If there are people who do not have access to the same type of freedom, this can threaten the principle of democracy because it can lead to more inequality. Johnson said in his speech: "You don't take a person who for years has been in chains and set them free, take them to the starting line of the race and then say 'you are free to compete with all.' from others and I still rightly believe that you were absolutely fair. This point shows that Lyndon B. Johnson was in favor of implementing affirmative action in the form of executive order across the country. I agree with this statement that a person who has not had the opportunity to compete could not do so because they may not have the resources, or simply because they do not don't know how. a class rather than racial issue in terms of access to higher education and better jobs. Until now, during the era of the civil rights movement, the goal of affirmative action was to provide equal opportunities to people from minorities. A recent article published on June 27, 2013, Class Based Affirmative Action is Right Way to Go, by Clarence Page, states that "diversity is a necessary goal, but the court appears to recognize that the norms of our society are evolving, as they should move from diversity strictly based on race to diversity based on class.” I agree that diversity is a necessary goal in terms of college admissions and access to today's job opportunities. Colleges must demonstratediversity so that students can be exposed to people from different backgrounds, and people from all backgrounds deserve access to a college education. It is also an important opportunity for young people to discover different cultures that are not their own by leaving their comfort zone. Affirmative action evolved from allowing minorities to achieve goals that allowed students from different social classes to be able to compete at the same level. Students from a multiracial environment have the chance to prove themselves in a challenging environment to which they are not accustomed. They simultaneously enrich the homogenous student body while mixing the beliefs they are taught. Kennedy even wrote that “the benefits of student diversity that embraces a wide range of qualifications and racial or ethnic characteristics is only one important element.” I agree with Kennedy because a diverse student body allows students to exchange ideas and provide solutions to different problems that may exist. The Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v. University of Texas led to questioning of affirmative action. The case involved a student who was rejected from the University of Texas because she was white. Less qualified students were accepted into the university due to the quota system in place at the university. This case called into question the constitutionality of implementing positive action even if it constitutes discrimination against a certain group of people. He also questioned that if affirmative action were abolished, it would result in less diversity on college campuses. People are against affirmative action because it is seen as helping minorities access higher education and employment over whites. Josh Barro, in a June 24, 2013 Business Insider article, Clarence Thomas: Affirmative Action is Just like Segregation by Josh Barro, states that Clarence Thomas "would have categorically rejected Texas' affirmative action program as unconstitutional." I was surprised when Clarence Thomas said he would have rejected the affirmative action program. One of the reasons he gave was that he thought it hurt blacks and Latinos rather than helping them, because he thought it should be about merit rather than filling the school's quota , because in the long run, it could hurt rather than help the student. . I disagree with this because people marginalized by society should have the opportunity to compete like everyone else in higher education and employment. I understand this point of view of Clarence Thomas because the fundamental right of this country is that everyone has equal opportunities regardless of race or gender. “All candidates must be treated equally before the law and no advantage, in the eyes of the beholder, can justify racial discrimination. » I agree with this statement, but to a certain extent, because the law is supposed to be fair to minority groups. Every person is lucky enough to have an opportunity regardless of the color of their skin. The law is slowly creating a problem in society by creating resentment within a group of people and believing that they were given this opportunity because of someone else's sacrifice for not having the same opportunity. The majority of people opposed to affirmative action are Caucasians. The reason they oppose affirmative action is because of the injustice it creates and the loss of opportunities for qualified applicants who are not admitted, but applicants.