Violence throughout history is due to a number of conglomerate reasons; Some researchers argue that this is due to the prehistoric nature of humans, while others argue that it is a response to environmental problems such as overpopulation. Human violence can be seen as associated with food shortages and overpopulation, particularly among poor people and lower social classes. But is man's aggression really inherent? - It can be argued that those who are wealthier in society would demonstrate less violent ways. However, in wealthier areas of England and Wales, crime rates more than doubled between the 1950s and 1960s, as did other wealthy areas (Russell and Russell, 1979). A substantial study was carried out by Russell & Russell on populations of monkeys. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay They made a direct comparison between monkeys living in the wild and monkeys in the zoo: they both shared a reserve abundant food. So the major differences they observed were the violence and quarrelsome behavior of the monkeys in the zoo due to the lack of space and freedom to move around. A dictatorship exercised by larger and more powerful males in the zoo was also noted in this study; this feature has also been observed in other previously conducted population studies. Therefore, it can be understood that mammals, just like humans, have the ability to behave in a calm and merciful manner if the surrounding conditions permit. An observation made by Stanislav Andreski pointed out that when prisoners of war were released, they would draw around their bodies the outline of the space they wanted (Russell & Russell, 1979). In an effort to gain a scientific understanding of primitive and human behaviors, a study was conducted recently which showed that the predicted level of interpersonal violence between humans was very similar to that of primates, highlighting that lethal violence was deeply ingrained in human ancestry. (Gomez, Verdu, Gonzalez-Megias, & Mendez, 2016). Overall, the prevalence of aggression is high in animals, so what can we expect from humans? Fundamentally, it is understood that violence is a public health problem and continues to grow globally. The Lancet Journal, 2002, stated that changes are needed to refocus attention on reducing violence through behavioral, social and environmental means, through policies, laws and public health awareness, c i.e. media campaigns and reduction of risk factors (Krug et al., 2002; Mercy et al., 1993). At the other end of the spectrum, it is necessary to understand where violence and aggressive behavior come from, how they manifest in today's man and how they shape youth. Violence is not a new phenomenon, with recent information showing that the most brutal massacre took place around 10,000 years ago in Naratuk, Africa (Seemangal, 2016). Violence can serve important functions for a society and species in which the dominant predominate and the weak are eliminated, helping the remaining individuals in the species adapt to a new environment and become superior, sassy, ​​and faster. In animals, aggression is used between dominant males to develop a hierarchy and intimidate other males,.