The world is flat or not flatRegardless of whether the world is flat or not, we still have an unprecedented situation to deal with. The global economy is getting bigger or, as Thomas Friedman explains, getting smaller. Right now, in Spain, a fifteen-year-old child can view exactly the same content as a university professor at Harvard. As this happens all over the world with even more extreme examples, the question arises: is this good for our world, or can it be devastating? Thomas Friedman argues that this is incredible for the world and will send us into areas we never thought we could reach. However, others argue that this flattening has horrible effects, while others argue that this flattening doesn't even exist. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayAny individual in the world can access virtually anything. This is causing a revolution in technology, knowledge, relationships and things we never thought possible. This flattening not only affects our economy, but also every aspect of our lives. In the article Why the World is Flat by Daniel H. Pink, Pink sits down with Friedman and asks him about his theory of the flat world. Pink interviews Friedman about his book and explains that China and India are areas of the world that will be greatly influenced by flattening. Friedman responds with an astonishing example: “Bill Gates has a great line: he says, 20 years ago, would you have preferred to be a B student in Poughkeepsie or a genius in Shanghai? Twenty years ago, you'd rather be a B student in Poughkeepsie. Today? “This illustrates the key aspect of how the flat world can change lives. The answer is the boy from Shanghai. In the past, only the richest countries were able to create a future for students and provide them with adequate education. But now anyone with a decade-old computer or phone can access any piece of knowledge on the Internet. Friedman also mentions more support in Pink's article. After Friedman explains how he came up with the idea for why the world is flat, he states: "Several technological and political forces have converged, resulting in a global, web-based playing field that allows multiple forms of collaboration without regard to geography or environment. distance – or soon, even language. This reinforces the idea that a flat world can give anything to anyone. However, anyone can talk about this topic, but can they back up their words with statistics to prove it? With all of Thomas Friedman's talk, it's easy to get caught up in the world-flattening movement. However, is the world as interconnected as Friedman believes? Dr Pankaj Ghemawat, professor at IESE Barcelona, ​​explains that using statistics we are really not interconnected at all. We discussed in class that Ghemawat says only two percent of calls worldwide are international, with six percent including Skype and Web chats. This reinforces the idea that our world is not flat, far from it. If the world is so flat, why are only 6% of calls worldwide international? Ghemawat also brings up the idea that perhaps immigration could show us how the world is starting to flatten. It asks the question of how many first-generation immigrants are currently in different countries around the world. The answer is three percent. This is a serious blow to the theory.