Nowadays there are huge debates between the development of the city and the conservation of the past: some say that old buildings should be replaced by buildings and modern shopping centers because these developments could bring in more money. Some will say that these precious heritage sites should be preserved. In my opinion, historical heritage should be preserved as much as possible. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay People claim that preserving the past has been presented as the alternative to economic development: either we have historic preservation or we have economic growth. Their excuse for rebuilding the entire neighborhood is that it can create jobs and boost the local economy by transforming it into a more profitable land use, but preserving heritage through restoration can also create job opportunities. This is a high potential market to develop, as there are still valuable historic buildings and sites that need to be preserved in the city, and this even creates more jobs than normal construction. In Norway, historic rehabilitation creates 16.5% more jobs than the construction of new buildings; In England, around 86,000 skilled workers are employed to rehabilitate almost 5 million historic sites and buildings across the country. As specific skills are required for rehabilitation, training courses are conducted around the world, helping unemployed people to equip themselves and work again. In the environmental field, people support the idea of ​​new development and claim that after the destruction of the demolished heritage, it will be replaced by buildings that are environmentally friendly and produce less greenhouse gases . Thank you for their thoughtful efforts, but minimizing the environmental impacts of architecture can be achieved through the improvement and preservation of existing buildings, including ancient heritage. They forget to mention that by reusing an existing structure, we reduce the amount of raw materials needed for new construction, which helps eliminate the problem of air pollution by reducing the embodied energy needed for production and transport of new materials. Overall, when people preserve and rehabilitate a historic building, we reduce waste; in doing so, we recycle the world's resources and reduce the level of environmental pollution. People claim that we can build more museums to recall people's memories of the history of their past, why waste time and effort to preserve the ancient structure? Unfortunately, museums offer a particular perspective on the past, which is why objects and images inside museums can be described in a positive or negative way, depending on the subject of the museum or even the country. For example, the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum in Japan caused controversy: it only displayed the destruction caused by the atomic bomb, but did not mention the history of its invasions during World War II. Yet if we can preserve historic buildings and heritage, people will be able to discover more and develop their own perspective by observing places for themselves. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom EssayIn conclusion, wealth preservation would solve the problem of unemployment because it.