Innovation has always seemed to be the greatest benefit and the greatest risk for humanity. With its many benefits, it doesn't seem like people have lived long enough to see the list of repercussions that come from the continued amount of "advancements" and "modifications" that people have invented. Humanity can, however, see this evidenced in the automotive industry. Although cars were invented in 1885, wearing seat belts was not mandatory until 1966. So, before this time, many car manufacturers prided themselves on the "mobility" they offered their customers by removing seat belts without mentioning, or considering. , the risk that came without having it. The auto industry's newest spectacle is a vehicle that can drive itself, but neither the public nor the industry itself is fully prepared to take on the responsibilities and challenges that come with this new innovation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayThe immediate assumption that comes with a self-driving car is, simply put, ease. The convenience of letting the machine take over while you enjoy the extra time on your hands to do what feels convenient. The immediate mentality is not only idealistic, but also marked by a lack of responsibility. Consider the 2016 fatal car crash that ended the partnership between Mobileye (a company that provides collision avoidance assistance) and Tesla (an auto manufacturing company specializing in electric cars). The accident occurred when the Tesla Model S failed to detect a semi-trailer while crossing in front of the Model S. As Tech and Telecom Editor Chris Neiger noted, "neither company "publicly blamed the other for the accident, but Tesla CEO Elon Musk made comments that were not complimentary toward Mobileye following the accident" (Neiger). In situations like this, it's difficult to understand who exactly is at fault, making it even more difficult to resolve problems that tend to arise due to unforeseen circumstances. This lack of accountability transcends the auto industry, as evidenced by the fact that some consumers of self-driving cars tend to abuse automatic driving functions. “There has been a whole series of debates and reports of people in Teslas on highways, asleep at the wheel, driven by autopilot” (Templenton). If the choice of negligence were protected by a level of safety that accompanies the most recent innovations, it would be more practical for people to drive recklessly. Another dilemma is much more complicated and much more philosophical, people should simply ask themselves where reckless driving lies. should humans set moral boundaries with self-driving cars? According to computer scientist and co-author Iyad Rahwan, "People who think about machine ethics make it seem like you can come up with a perfect set of rules for robots, and that's what we show here with the data , is that there are no universal rules. », (Maxmen). Published by Nature Research (a leading international scientific journal), the largest survey ever recorded on machine ethics charters asks more than 2.3 million people around the world a very difficult question: what moral code do they should self-driving cars have? (Maxmen). To do this, he presented thirteen.