-
Essay / Opinion Against Gun Control: Why Gun Control Doesn't Work
Although gun control may seem favorable and morally appealing on the surface, I am against gun control. fire. I can assure you that once you look at the facts and hard evidence, you will understand why it makes sense to not have gun control laws in America. There are many credible studies and concrete examples that prove why no gun control is a much better alternative than strict gun control. Strict gun control laws kill more people than they save, which is why this is such an important issue. If you can look past common opinions and biases, and take the time to thoroughly research the topic of gun control and find the facts and evidence, you will understand why no gun control is the way to go. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"?Get the original essayAccording to New York Times author Sabrina Tavernise, in the United States, about 23% of people living in cities own firearms and about 56% of people living in rural areas do so. The true number is estimated to be much higher because in many states it is not necessary to have a license to own certain types of weapons, meaning there are many unregistered weapons. In fact, there are an estimated 270 to 300 million guns circulating in the United States. That's almost a weapon for every American citizen. So we can conclude that the topic of gun control affects many people. One of the major flaws with gun control is the fact that criminals will always find a way to obtain guns. “Homicide findings suggest that where guns are scarce, other guns are substituted in murders,” cites a Harvard study. If a person is motivated enough, they will find a way, and we've already established that there are about 300 million guns in the United States, so finding a way wouldn't be too difficult. Removing guns would only disarm law-abiding citizens, leaving them defenseless against criminal attacks. “Gun control laws assure thieves and bad guys that the person they want to shoot will be defenseless,” says Earl Bumpkin, a Pantagraph writer. Some may say we have the police to protect us. But the problem is that the police cannot be everywhere at once. In fact, they may be quite far from the crime scene. The average police response time is around ten minutes, but it can sometimes take up to more than 20 minutes in some areas. A lot can happen between 10 and 20 minutes; people can die, stores can be robbed, cars can be stolen, and many other events can take place. This is why citizens must be armed. FBI reports show that despite the ongoing debate over gun control, violent crime has declined since 2007. What's interesting is that gun ownership has increased at the same time. The increasing amount of guns could actually lead to a decline in crime rates. Take for example Russia, a country that enforces very strict gun control laws on its population. They have a very high crime rate despite gun control laws, maybe even because of them. The more citizens who own guns, the less likely it is that.