The intellectual hacking common on the streets of New York has its origins in China. Whether it is electronic devices such as phones and laptops, or luxury brands such as Gucci and Dolce & Gabbana, intellectual piracy has become a serious problem in China, with its wings spreading far and wide. 'in New York's Chinatown. The video Intellectual Piracy in China discusses the scale of piracy from China; he explains how counterfeit products are taking over most of the market in China and gives the specific example of fake Viagra in China which could lead to life-threatening situations because fake versions of the pill are made with chemicals that could be dangerous for human use. . The Coping with Piracy in China case covers similar topics to those in the video and focuses primarily on counterfeit Apple products offered by China. According to the case article, there were at least five Apple own-brand stores in a single city in China (“Coping with Piracy in China,” n.d.). However, the case article highlights how China's counterfeiting market could actually benefit Apple. as a business rather than otherwise. This article will analyze what the video and case study focus on regarding intellectual hacking in China by examining the content of the video and case study and explaining my opinion on the conclusions drawn, as well as the reasons for which I agree with the conclusions of the video. , although I do not agree with the conclusions of the case study. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay According to the case article, Apple's own-brand stores in China are among the busiest Apple stores in the world ( “Confronting Piracy in China,” nd). Tourists in China can easily find one of these branded stores and purchase counterfeit Apple products themselves for only a small percentage of the actual cost of the real product. Although hundreds of patent attorneys and investigators are interested in these branded items, the stores and the people who make them, Apple has yet to comment on the entire situation, and the study of case believes that instead of harming the company, these self-made Apple brands actually promote the Apple brand for free and are considered beneficial to Apple ("Coping with Piracy in China", n.d.). Self-branded Apple stores provide a way for the Apple company itself to promote itself in a huge market, the Chinese market, at no cost to it. Unfortunately, I do not agree with the conclusions drawn from the case study conclusion. I find it controversial that the case study explicitly states how huge the market for counterfeit products is in China, but also implies that this is actually beneficial for Apple. Even though the Apple brand is promoted for free, it is not their own products that are sold. Apple is already an international company with one of the largest customer bases, and they don't need the unnecessary promotion of a company copying their brand to have a beneficial outcome within their own company. Also, the case study states that this has benefits for the Apple company, but the Apple company itself talks about how "more than $11 billion is lost to piracy every year" ("Piracy Prevention”, nd). On their website, Apple mainly focuses on software piracy, but it still shows that they are negatively affected by piracy.