blog




  • Essay / The Effects of Counter-Terrorism Strategy

    Global powers, in their race for growing power and influence, exploit resourceful or strategically important states and destabilize them in a very systematic way. They consider it right to interfere in the internal affairs of other states, in the name of anti-terrorism strategy, and thus uproot their political and social fabric. The excessive use of force during the GWOT also caused an increase in terrorism, as it created a sense of estrangement and deprivation among people who ultimately sought revenge. It is obvious that if someone spends years invading, bombing and imposing tyranny, some of them will want revenge. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There is a reason why the United States and NATO countries are targeted and Korea and Brazil are not. Terrorists do not choose states based on name alone; they carry out terrorist activities for specific reasons and objectives. How can we think that the participation of Spain and the United Kingdom in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 played no causal role in the train bombing in Madrid in 2004 and in the London bombing in 2005? British intelligence officials also acknowledge this link. US policies such as Guantanamo and torture have been key factors in the radicalization of Muslims against the United States. In its statement claiming responsibility for the Paris attack, ISIS cited multiple religious justifications for the violence, but also said that France was their target because of their war against Islam in France and their strikes against Muslims in Iraq and Syria. ISIS also claimed responsibility for an attack on a Russian plane in retaliation for Russian airstrikes in Syria, as well as an attack on Lebanon in response to Hezbollah violence. Even in cases where religious extremism rather than anger at Western violence seems to be the priority. major cause like the Charlie Hebdo murders, carried out to avenge what the attackers saw as blasphemous caricatures, it is clear that the attackers were radicalized by outrage over American atrocities in Islamic states. Stressing that Western violence is a key causal factor in the fight against Western terrorism does not mean that it is the only cause. The whole point of the argument is that they are not forced or coerced or acting reflexively; the fact is that they have decided that the only valid and effective response to Western attacks and interference against Muslim societies is to fight back. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Paper Essay When a friend asked the Times Square bomber about the prospect of a peaceful protest against American violence and interference in Muslim countries, he replied: "Can you tell me a way to save the oppressed? And a way to fight back when rockets are fired. against us and Muslim blood flows freely?" One can dispute the validity of this reasoning but one cannot deny that the decision to engage in this violence is the process of reasoning in action..