blog




  • Essay / Destiny and Free Will in Slumdog Millionaire and The Great Gatsby

    The 2008 film Slumdog Millionaire directed by Dany Boyle and the novel The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald published in 1925, explore the truth of fate of both protagonists whatever their social context. The director and author used representations, symbolism and imagery to open the eyes of contemporary audiences and demonstrate the power of destiny. This extraordinary playwright and author included imaginative descriptive and figurative language that emphasizes values, attitudes, and beliefs. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Brilliantly, the author of the book and the director of the film have an opposite social context of their protagonists. The novelist made Gatsby the protagonist – a rich and powerful man, which contrasts with the film's protagonist, Jamal, who comes from the slums of Mumbai and works as a tea waiter. The depiction of the fate of the two protagonists' relationship has been shown in different types of texts, novels and films. Interestingly, each of these works depicts a character pursuing a love interest. Here are two characters Gatsby and Jamal from very different social environments who had very different results in their search for a love interest. Gatsby's free will in choosing to believe that he could win back the love of his life, Daisy, through his wealth and social success. This belief is particularly successfully represented in the sentence “Can’t repeat the past? Why, of course you can! " in which he shows how Gatsby's destiny is to find Daisy. However, in an additional chapter of the novel, Gatsby's plan ultimately proves to be beyond his control. As he realizes this, Gatsby comes to terms with death and blames himself for Myrtle's loss. Ultimately, Daisy chose to stay with Tom. Gatsby chooses to try to win her back, but fails. Additionally, it shows that Gatsby's wealth and status do not matter. This contrasts with Jamal's situation in scene 7. Jamal in Slumdog Millionaire chose to participate in the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" because he thought it was the best way to find Latika and he won. After the show, he goes to the station and sees Latika. It was here that he lived happily ever after (it is written). Obviously, the representation of destiny has been confronted throughout the stories. Both stories were shared with the public to show that money doesn't buy happiness. But fate controls much of what happens in both works, helping Jamal and stopping Gatsby. As Slumdog Millionaire and The Great Gatsby are seemingly an opposing text, Boyle and Fitzgerald both used symbolism to express how fate is the true dominant force. Regardless of different social statuses, both upper classes and lower classes value money. The talented author and playwright used monotonous symbolic colors - green in The Great Gatsby and yellow in Slumdog Millionaire - illustrating how the characters' destiny is to achieve wealth and, therefore, to be worth it for their love interest. Remarkably, the green light is a symbol for Gatsby despite his plight: through his wealth and money he could win Daisy back, but in the long run he ends up fighting himself and chasing his own heartbreaking and lonely destiny. “Gatsby believes in the green light, in the orgastic future which, year after year, recedes before us. It escaped us then, but it doesn't matter – tomorrow we will run faster, we will stretch our arms further…… And one morning, we.