The most obvious example of the dangers of over-immunization is when the reader discovers that El Tano, Gustavo, and Urovich are the people who were lying dead in the pool all along of the novel. We learn that they had in fact committed suicide, a subject Virginia brings up early in the novel about a former resident of Antieri who had also committed suicide: “se había volado los sesos.” Unable to escape the economic crisis and the thought of having to leave La Cascada, the three men make a suicide pact so that their families can continue to live inside the gates. "The best of a day, of a year, when it comes to another country, something changes and we have a serial country, but it's going to be later, we're not going to have a day to enjoy[…]but we can save our family from the caída'. El Tano blames the state for all his problems when in reality it is El Tano himself who is responsible for withdrawing from society in the first place. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an original essay In "Pizza, Birra Faso", Cordobés, Frula and Megabom also end up dying. Despite the opposing lives of the characters in the two texts, their fates ended up being exactly the same, but the characters died for different reasons. In the novel, the characters are over-immunized to the point that the idea of ​​no longer living within the walls of their closed community is so overwhelming that they must end their lives, so accustomed are they to living there. Whereas in the film, the characters die because they failed to immunize themselves against modernity despite their attempts and because of the collapse of the national community which left them alone. The filmmakers intentionally place the camera on the back of the boat in the very last scene so that the viewer can see Cordobés die with the blurry city in the background looking back at him as if to shift blame to the state and emphasize the disconnect between the city. and its citizens. Immunity, although designed to protect life, ultimately ends up destroying it, since it destroys the “communitas” on which our existence is based. If this foundation of our existence is destroyed, we are destroyed with it. Thus, to conclude this essay, the vaccination paradigm can explain the destruction of society, its communities and urban life in Buenos Aires. I highlighted the challenges of urban life in Argentina at the time; privatization, unemployment, top-down corruption, inflation and crime have all contributed to widening the already present gap between rich and poor. The Argentine government's attempt at urbanization and resulting failure before the 2002 economic crisis created an urban environment defined by fear and uncertainty. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get Custom Essay Naturally, when humans or animals feel fear, their first instinct is to protect or immunize themselves. The destruction of the national community occurred because those who moved into the closed communities withdrew their contribution to the national community due to this fear and desire for protection. Piñeiro's novel gives an example of an over-immunized community and the dangerous effects this has on the community and its individuals. On the other hand, Caetano and Stagnaro's film presents the viewer with the opposite perspective, we see the point of view of those who are considered "the disease" and the unfortunate consequences this has on their lives. Additionally, the film shows the boys' non-conformism as a.