Summary of a Moral Calculation by Daniel Goldhagen Daniel Goldhagen's controversial moral investigation, "A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair", published in 2002. Goldhagen attended Harvard University as a graduate, undergraduate and professor deputy until he was denied his position in 2003; this perhaps indicates his limited status as an academic. Goldhagen notes that he is "indebted" to his father, a Holocaust survivor, for some of his discoveries about the Holocaust. This personal connection with the Holocaust on the one hand allows Goldhagen to write with more passion. On the other hand, it obscures his ability to view evidence objectively, evident in the book under review. Goldhagen's status rose to fame due to the controversial nature of his first book, "Hitler's Willful Executioners," published in 1996. It received widespread criticism and, perhaps more importantly, criticism. from Goldhagen, a lot of publicity. The book's controversial claims, whether academically valid or not, have established relative novice status among historians. This is evident in the abundance of secondary literature that comments on Goldhagen's work, including that edited by F. Littell and F. Kautz. Goldhagen's credentials as a controversial author explain the extremist content of his second book, "A Moral Reckoning." Goldhagen's academic background in political science is evident in the book's emphasis on the Church as a "political institution" and the pope as a "political leader" (p. 184). . This limits his work as a historian to the extent that he fails to fully examine the role of the individual. Goldhagen's notes in the middle of the paper are manipulated for his argument. Goldhagen's controversial and thought-provoking study encourages further research, and in 2013 Jewish leaders pressured Pope Francis to open the Vatican archives from 1939 to 1947. Opening these archives will spark more investigations in this area and until these archives are opened, the historical record will not be clarified. The importance of these archives illustrates the interesting nature of historical literature. The study of history focuses primarily on primary materials, but these materials do not provide a definitive representation of the past. Historians analyze primary sources to derive an interpretation of the past. The divergences between the interpretations of historians form the historiographical debate. It would be interesting to examine the extent to which historians are perhaps just academic storytellers..

Essay / Summary of a Moral Calculation by Daniel Goldhagen Daniel Goldhagen's controversial moral investigation, "A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair", published in 2002. Goldhagen attended Harvard University as a graduate, undergraduate and professor deputy until he was denied his position in 2003; this perhaps indicates his limited status as an academic. Goldhagen notes that he is "indebted" to his father, a Holocaust survivor, for some of his discoveries about the Holocaust. This personal connection with the Holocaust on the one hand allows Goldhagen to write with more passion. On the other hand, it obscures his ability to view evidence objectively, evident in the book under review. Goldhagen's status rose to fame due to the controversial nature of his first book, "Hitler's Willful Executioners," published in 1996. It received widespread criticism and, perhaps more importantly, criticism. from Goldhagen, a lot of publicity. The book's controversial claims, whether academically valid or not, have established relative novice status among historians. This is evident in the abundance of secondary literature that comments on Goldhagen's work, including that edited by F. Littell and F. Kautz. Goldhagen's credentials as a controversial author explain the extremist content of his second book, "A Moral Reckoning." Goldhagen's academic background in political science is evident in the book's emphasis on the Church as a "political institution" and the pope as a "political leader" (p. 184). . This limits his work as a historian to the extent that he fails to fully examine the role of the individual. Goldhagen's notes in the middle of the paper are manipulated for his argument. Goldhagen's controversial and thought-provoking study encourages further research, and in 2013 Jewish leaders pressured Pope Francis to open the Vatican archives from 1939 to 1947. Opening these archives will spark more investigations in this area and until these archives are opened, the historical record will not be clarified. The importance of these archives illustrates the interesting nature of historical literature. The study of history focuses primarily on primary materials, but these materials do not provide a definitive representation of the past. Historians analyze primary sources to derive an interpretation of the past. The divergences between the interpretations of historians form the historiographical debate. It would be interesting to examine the extent to which historians are perhaps just academic storytellers..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch