Review and Analysis by Laura Ingraham The Good News They Don't Tell You followed the election of Trump and its benefits for blue-collar workers. However, the credit doesn't just go to Trump's cabinet. The results of this boom are starting to show, and it's not all good news. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay What's the Angle on Laura IngrahamLaura Ingraham is a television and radio talk show host. She is a frequent contributor to FOX on a few shows, including FOX and Friends, Special Report, and her own show, The Ingraham Angle. This show is a FOX show where Laura Ingraham discusses current events, especially political stories. The show aims to "cut through the chatter of Washington to speak directly with unexpected voices and with the real people who are affected by the news of the day" (FOX). In November 2017, Ingraham published an article titled "The Good News They Have." I'm Not Telling You" about the recent economic boom. The story focuses on how "America is back!" and the rise in wages and success of commerce. What Ingraham doesn't tell you Also, Ingraham is targeting her audience to get the message across. She's not necessarily looking for new viewers here; she wants her established audience to listen to familiar news. According to Ingraham, the current administration has worked tirelessly to secure the news. The American economy after "President Obama's anemic and recoveryless recovery." This work secured the economy and created a boom in business industries. Ingraham uses a statement from Robert Lighthizer and other statistics to support his statements. overall, she supports the current administration and criticizes the Obama administration Evidence for a lack of evidence Ingraham does a good job laying out the foundations of her statements, but it's not that black and white. . When she makes her statements, she does not cite any sources. It shows pictures of percentages without any indication of where it gets the numbers from. Additionally, the few sources she uses come from herself. When she uses herself as a source, it proves a certain discredit. For example, she uses her interview with Robert Lighthizer as the source for her statement. If Ingraham had used another source to support her claims (like another interview or article outside of FOX), it could have worked in her favor. However, this is the only source she uses to defend the rising economy. Researching other sources, it is clear that not everything is one-sided. A PBS article states: "Economists generally agree that growth accelerated this year compared to 2016 and 2017, and most credit last year's tax cuts in part for have further fueled consumer and business spending. The economy is on track to grow at a rate of 3%. or a faster pace in 2018, which would be the first time since 2005 that it has reached this level. » However, reading further, this is no different from what happened under the Obama administration. Under the previous administration, the economy grew 2.9% in 2015. This year, it is forecast to grow only 0.1% more than in 2015. Although this shows growth in economy, it is not a rapid increase as Ingraham (Rugaber) states. begins talk of job cuts at the White Houseand the number of employees of the First Lady without mentioning the future of the economy outside of blue-collar workers. This causes a form of omission, because it evokes one side of the economy without talking about the other. What is the future of the economy? Potentially, not much. The Bloomberg article, The United States Chose Slow Economic Growth, shows how the United States is on track to return to its 1995 boom, but is being held back by the Federal Reserve. This is to keep the inflation rate at a stable level of 2%, but maintaining this percentage could have disastrous consequences in the future.future. It is also a form of veiled variable, without the numbers always being there. As noted in How to Think About News: A Journalist's Guide to Critical Thinking by Carl Hausman, “Note that what is excluded from a number is at least as important as what is included in it. » It is important to note that the economy may not improve during this period. We won't know for 100% certainty what's causing this boom until we look back at the story later, because many different sources could report on it in different ways, just like Ingraham reports from his perspective . Employers are increasingly complaining about labor shortages. A shrinking labor stock, combined with above-trend economic growth, generally means faster wage growth and inflation are ahead, the type of conditions that lead the Fed to raise rates of interest more quickly. We will repeat the boom of 1995, but with inflation stable and wages not increasing, we will remain stagnant and fall behind other countries enacting their own changes. This shows another side of Ingraham's argument; She is right with her ideas about an economic boom, but we must keep in mind the future of this boom. Even if the boom is contained, this does not always mean that it is better for employment. In a recent Bloomberg article titled Underemployment is the New Unemployment, we learn about the effects of our new economy. In Western countries like the US, UK and Germany, we are seeing a huge boom in job growth. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate in August 2018 was 3.9%. This number is low, but the jobs offered do not necessarily match everyone's skills. The emergence of blue-collar jobs doesn't always tell the whole picture, just as Ingraham doesn't show how those in these positions might be underemployed. This transition from unemployment to underemployment impacts all areas. From blue-collar workers to white-collar workers and everything in between, someone isn't paid enough or given the necessary benefits for whatever qualifications they may have. Ingraham's Motivation When we consider all the facts presented, it is clear that Ingraham's overall goal is to make people understand her policies. and accept them. On most political news shows like Ingraham's, the host wants his viewers to know that what he is saying is true. This is a common problem on political shows on both the left and the right. Both sides want to recruit but only show what is wrong with the other side instead of showing an unbiased opinion. On closer inspection, it will likely show that the current administration is better than Obama's. In the video, Ingraham shows the dramatic change between the Obama and Trump administrations. Since Trump came to power, many right-wing politicians and supporters have “come forward.” In the past, Trump's statements would have been,.

Essay / Review and Analysis by Laura Ingraham The Good News They Don't Tell You followed the election of Trump and its benefits for blue-collar workers. However, the credit doesn't just go to Trump's cabinet. The results of this boom are starting to show, and it's not all good news. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay What's the Angle on Laura IngrahamLaura Ingraham is a television and radio talk show host. She is a frequent contributor to FOX on a few shows, including FOX and Friends, Special Report, and her own show, The Ingraham Angle. This show is a FOX show where Laura Ingraham discusses current events, especially political stories. The show aims to "cut through the chatter of Washington to speak directly with unexpected voices and with the real people who are affected by the news of the day" (FOX). In November 2017, Ingraham published an article titled "The Good News They Have." I'm Not Telling You" about the recent economic boom. The story focuses on how "America is back!" and the rise in wages and success of commerce. What Ingraham doesn't tell you Also, Ingraham is targeting her audience to get the message across. She's not necessarily looking for new viewers here; she wants her established audience to listen to familiar news. According to Ingraham, the current administration has worked tirelessly to secure the news. The American economy after "President Obama's anemic and recoveryless recovery." This work secured the economy and created a boom in business industries. Ingraham uses a statement from Robert Lighthizer and other statistics to support his statements. overall, she supports the current administration and criticizes the Obama administration Evidence for a lack of evidence Ingraham does a good job laying out the foundations of her statements, but it's not that black and white. . When she makes her statements, she does not cite any sources. It shows pictures of percentages without any indication of where it gets the numbers from. Additionally, the few sources she uses come from herself. When she uses herself as a source, it proves a certain discredit. For example, she uses her interview with Robert Lighthizer as the source for her statement. If Ingraham had used another source to support her claims (like another interview or article outside of FOX), it could have worked in her favor. However, this is the only source she uses to defend the rising economy. Researching other sources, it is clear that not everything is one-sided. A PBS article states: "Economists generally agree that growth accelerated this year compared to 2016 and 2017, and most credit last year's tax cuts in part for have further fueled consumer and business spending. The economy is on track to grow at a rate of 3%. or a faster pace in 2018, which would be the first time since 2005 that it has reached this level. » However, reading further, this is no different from what happened under the Obama administration. Under the previous administration, the economy grew 2.9% in 2015. This year, it is forecast to grow only 0.1% more than in 2015. Although this shows growth in economy, it is not a rapid increase as Ingraham (Rugaber) states. begins talk of job cuts at the White Houseand the number of employees of the First Lady without mentioning the future of the economy outside of blue-collar workers. This causes a form of omission, because it evokes one side of the economy without talking about the other. What is the future of the economy? Potentially, not much. The Bloomberg article, The United States Chose Slow Economic Growth, shows how the United States is on track to return to its 1995 boom, but is being held back by the Federal Reserve. This is to keep the inflation rate at a stable level of 2%, but maintaining this percentage could have disastrous consequences in the future.future. It is also a form of veiled variable, without the numbers always being there. As noted in How to Think About News: A Journalist's Guide to Critical Thinking by Carl Hausman, “Note that what is excluded from a number is at least as important as what is included in it. » It is important to note that the economy may not improve during this period. We won't know for 100% certainty what's causing this boom until we look back at the story later, because many different sources could report on it in different ways, just like Ingraham reports from his perspective . Employers are increasingly complaining about labor shortages. A shrinking labor stock, combined with above-trend economic growth, generally means faster wage growth and inflation are ahead, the type of conditions that lead the Fed to raise rates of interest more quickly. We will repeat the boom of 1995, but with inflation stable and wages not increasing, we will remain stagnant and fall behind other countries enacting their own changes. This shows another side of Ingraham's argument; She is right with her ideas about an economic boom, but we must keep in mind the future of this boom. Even if the boom is contained, this does not always mean that it is better for employment. In a recent Bloomberg article titled Underemployment is the New Unemployment, we learn about the effects of our new economy. In Western countries like the US, UK and Germany, we are seeing a huge boom in job growth. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate in August 2018 was 3.9%. This number is low, but the jobs offered do not necessarily match everyone's skills. The emergence of blue-collar jobs doesn't always tell the whole picture, just as Ingraham doesn't show how those in these positions might be underemployed. This transition from unemployment to underemployment impacts all areas. From blue-collar workers to white-collar workers and everything in between, someone isn't paid enough or given the necessary benefits for whatever qualifications they may have. Ingraham's Motivation When we consider all the facts presented, it is clear that Ingraham's overall goal is to make people understand her policies. and accept them. On most political news shows like Ingraham's, the host wants his viewers to know that what he is saying is true. This is a common problem on political shows on both the left and the right. Both sides want to recruit but only show what is wrong with the other side instead of showing an unbiased opinion. On closer inspection, it will likely show that the current administration is better than Obama's. In the video, Ingraham shows the dramatic change between the Obama and Trump administrations. Since Trump came to power, many right-wing politicians and supporters have “come forward.” In the past, Trump's statements would have been,.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch