We are all immigrants. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay We may have asked ourselves: what is an immigrant? With everything happening in the news, such as President Trump's desire to build a wall between Mexico and the United States of America to stop immigrants, we must add to our sad local reality of xenophobic attacks against immigrants within our own borders. We can look up the definition of immigrant, a noun defined as “a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country”. This is a basic definition, since there are even four types of immigrants. The claim that we are all immigrants is a rhetorical statement that does more harm than good. The phrase that we are all immigrants was developed in a hasty reaction to the 1960s movements against colonialism, neocolonialism, and white supremacy in the United States of America. America. Those in power at the time proposed multiculturalism, diversity and affirmative action in response to demands for decolonization, justice, reparations, social equality and an end to imperialism. This was also to ensure that the story would be accurate. What emerged from these ideas would replace the notion of a country founded on colonialism with that of a narrative that we are all immigrants. Although it may have started in the 1960s in America, it has also become a familiar narrative today. This narrative evolved over the years, eventually culminating to include indigenous peoples from different countries around the world. Historians and liberals argue that even the natives are not so indigenous that even they migrated from Africa to various parts of the world. This serves to weaken the indigenous populations of a country. They even claim that many Africans who reside in African countries have all migrated from one side to the other and are not even indigenous to their own country of residence. The theory that liberals use to support these claims is known as the “Bering Strait Theory of Indigenous Migration.” It has been criticized as a flawed theory, but it is still used. Using Native Americans as an example of this theory, they classify them as the first immigrants to America, followed by the English. Africans, Irish, Chinese, Eastern and Southern Europeans, Russians, Japanese and Mexicans. This narrative has the effect of distorting the European colonization of countries such as South Africa, the United States and India, as examples. So by making everyone an immigrant, it hides the fact that the original settlers were settlers, just like they were in Africa and India, or the Spanish in Central and South America. The difference between a settler and an immigrant is that a settler moves to a new land or country before it has become populated and an immigrant is one who comes after a country and its people are well established . Most of these countries listed were Anglo-Saxon empires, founded on settler brutality towards indigenous groups. As European settlers increased, native people moved away to other native groups for protection. Anglo-Saxon settlers and African slaves took over native farmland for plantation agriculture. Using Indian contract workers for sugarcane plantations. Even if it can be said that we are all descendants of immigrants or that our origins do not belong.